BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Main verb

Expert replies
by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:52 pm
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

Can 'were written' be considered the main verb of the main clause?

I understand that verb - ing (without the is/are/was/were/be) and verb - ed cannot act as a verb . But how about 'were + written' ( I suppose written here acts as the past participle) . Can words of this form (were/was + past participle) become the main verb of the sentence?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by EducationAisle » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:10 pm
Deepthi Subbu wrote:Can words of this form (were/was + past participle) become the main verb of the sentence?
Sure, why not. More specifically, were is the main verb and written, as you said, is a past participle (a verbal, in Grammar parlance).
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:25 pm
Thanks , but as per OG12, the sentence has an error -

Explanation - 'The long, wordy opening clause gives too much emphasis to the period when Dickinson's letters were written; it is unclear what outnumbering refers to.'

Cant the sentence mean

' Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, THEREBY
outnumbering her letters to anyone else. '

Here's the correct sentence -

'Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.'

A main clause can have only one verb. Here 'which' refers to the letters and if 'were written' becomes the main verb for the main clause , how can another verb 'outnumber' exist .

I guess am highly confused somewhere , but unable to realize as to where exactly the confusion is.
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:41 pm
Hi Deepthi,

Actually there are two clauses in the correct sentence (split just by the nature of the sentence):

1. Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

2. which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susans marriage to Emilys brother and ending shortly before Emilys death in 1886


Now, perhaps it would be easy for you to figure out that outnumber is the main verb in the first clause and were is the main verb in the second clause.

An easier example to understand how Independent clause can be split would be:

Sachin, who scored a century, is a great cricketer.

The two clauses here are:

1. Sachin is a great cricketer - is is the main verb

2. Who (Sachin) scored a century - scored is the main verb
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:50 am
EducationAisle wrote:Hi Deepthi,

Actually there are two clauses in the correct sentence (split just by the nature of the sentence):

1. Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

2. which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susans marriage to Emilys brother and ending shortly before Emilys death in 1886


Now, perhaps it would be easy for you to figure out that outnumber is the main verb in the first clause and were is the main verb in the second clause.

An easier example to understand how Independent clause can be split would be:

Sachin, who scored a century, is a great cricketer.

The two clauses here are:

1. Sachin is a great cricketer - is is the main verb

2. Who (Sachin) scored a century - scored is the main verb
Oh ya , got it now :)
That was a great explanation
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1