sarthak wrote:As one who has always believed that truth is our nation's surest weapon in the propaganda war against our foes, I am distressed by reports of "disinformation" campaigns by American intelligence agents in Western Europe. In a disinformation campaign, untruths are disseminated through gullible local journalists in order to damage the interests of our enemies and protect our own. Those who defend this practice say that lying is necessary to counter Soviet disinformation campaigns aimed at damaging America's political interests. These apologists contend that one must fight fire with fire. I would point out to the apologists that the fire department finds water more effective.

The author's main point is that

(A) although disinformation campaigns may be effective, they are unacceptable on ethical grounds
Incorrect : 'Ethical Grounds' is not discussed in the passage above.

(B) America's moral standing in the world depends on its adherence to the truth
Incorrect : There is no mention of 'morality' in the passage.

(C) the temporary political gains produced by disinformation campaigns generally give way to long-term losses
Incorrect : No mention about 'long-term' losses.

(D) Soviet disinformation campaigns have done little to damage America's standing in Europe
Incorrect : The passage only says that Soviet disinformation campaigns are aimed at damaging America's political
interests. It does not state whether soviet disinfo campaign has done little or more to damage America's standing in Europe. Eliminated.

(E) disinformation campaigns do not effectively serve the political interests of the United States
Correct : This answer choice encapsulates the author's point. Effectiveness of such campaigns is what the author is trying to say in the conclusion.
OA is E