BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

m-n = 11X, is X an integer

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

E ?

by AndreaV424 » Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:16 pm
If m and n are both two-digit numbers, and m-n = 11X, is X an integer?

(1) The tens digit and the units digit of m are the same
(2) m+n is a multiple of X

------------------------
I'll take a try at this..

Statement 1 alone tells you that m can be 11, 22, 33, 44, 55,.. and so on, but it doesn't tell you anything about the other variables.
This narrows your options to BCE

Statement 2 alone is not sufficient because we don't know what m and n are. (remember to ignore statement 1)

If we combine both statements, we know m is an integer. If n as an integer than yes, X would be an integer. If n was a non-integer then X would not an integer. Since there is no explicit "Yes" or "No" response to the question then the statements are not sufficient to answer the problem. I think E is the right answer, Am I right?
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:03 am
Very poorly stated question. I might be wrong, but theoretically -1.5 is a 2-digit number.

Either way it's D or E.

66 - 33 = 3*11
66 + 33 = 3 * 3 * 11

66 - 64 = 2 = 11 * 2/11
66 + 64 = 130 = 11 * 130/11 = 11 * 65 * 2/11

It has to be E
Join the discussion

by axat » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:31 am
It's B, strictly in my opinion. :)

Also, that doesn't take away from the fact that the question could have been worded better. I request you to state the source.

Statement 1: let 2 numbers be 18 and 51, there difference is 33, and X is an integer. Now take 37 and 23, their difference is 14, and X is not an integer. Insufficient.

Statement 2: take any 2 numbers whose difference is a multiple of 11, say 51 and 18, or, 17 and 39. In the case of 17 and 39, their difference is 22, i.e 2x11. and the sum of 17 and 39 is divisible by 2. Now reverse this logic in your head and feel the bulb light up. :)
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:13 pm
I agree with E.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by Morgoth » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:50 am
The question says m and n are two digit NUMBERS not INTEGERS

m = 22.43, 33.45, 88.98, etc

why are you guys assuming m and n to be an integer.

Hence, answer should be E.
Join the discussion