BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers

Expert replies
by rsarashi » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:33 am
M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300, inclusive. Which of the following is true?

(A) 1/3 < M < 1/2
(B) 1/5 < M < 1/3
(C) 1/7 < M < 1/5
(D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
(E) 1/12 < M < 1/9

OAA

What should be the approach.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:54 am
M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300 inclusive. Which of the following is true?
A) 1/3 <M 1/2
B)1/5<M<1/3
C)1/7 <M< 1/5
D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
E) 1/12 <M< 1/9
We want to find 1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + . . . + 1/299 + 1/300

NOTE: there are 100 fractions in this sum.

Let's examine the extreme values (1/201 and 1/300)

First consider a case where all of the values are equal to the smallest fraction (1/300)
We get: 1/300 + 1/300 + 1/300 + ... + 1/300 = 100/300 = 1/3
So, the original sum must be greater than 1/3

Now consider a case where all of the values are equal to the biggest fraction (1/201)
In fact, let's go a little bigger and use 1/200
We get: 1/200 + 1/200 + 1/200 + ... + 1/200 = 100/200 = 1/2
So, the original sum must be less than 1/2

Combine both cases to get 1/3 < M < 1/2 = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:47 am
Hi rsarashi,

In this prompt, the answer choices are "ranges"; this usually means that there's a way to avoid doing lots of math and instead use patterns and logic to save you time.

Brent's already pointed out the easiest way to figure out the minimum and maximum values of the sum of the reciprocals. You can actually stop working once you figure out the minimum though:

Since 1/300 < 1/201 and the sum of those 100 terms would be 1/3 AT THE MINIMUM, the only answer that's possible would be A. The extra work that Brent did just confirms the maximum value of the sum, but it's unnecessary.

As you continue to study, be mindful of how the answer choices are written - they can sometimes provide a huge hint into the fastest way to answer the question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:17 pm
rsarashi wrote:M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300, inclusive. Which of the following is true?

(A) 1/3 < M < 1/2
(B) 1/5 < M < 1/3
(C) 1/7 < M < 1/5
(D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
(E) 1/12 < M < 1/9
Let's first analyze the question. We are trying to find a potential range for M in which M is the sum of the reciprocals from 201 to 300 inclusive. Thus, M is:

1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + ... + 1/300

Since we probably would not be expected to do such time-consuming arithmetic (i.e., to add 100 fractions, each with a different denominator), that is exactly why the answer choices are in the form of an inequality. Thus, we do not need to know the EXACT value of M. The easiest way to determine the RANGE of values for M is to use easy numbers that can be quickly manipulated.

Notice that 1/200 is greater than each of the addends and that 1/300 is less than or equal to each of the addends. Therefore, instead of trying to add together 1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + ... + 1/300, we are going to add 1/200 one hundred times and 1/300 one hundred times. These two sums will give us a high estimate of M and a low estimate of M. Again, we are adding 1/200 one hundred times and 1/300 one hundred times because there are 100 numbers from 1/201 to 1/300.

Instead of actually adding each one of these values one hundred times, we will simply multiply each value by 100. This gives us:

1/300 x 100 = 1/3

1/200 x 100 = 1/2

We see that M is between 1/3 and 1/2.

Answer: A

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:03 pm
A nice trick when working with unworkable numbers is to find some friendlier numbers with which to compare them. So if we've got, say

1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5

We know that each of those terms is ≤ 1/2, so we can say

1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 ≥ 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5

Here, it's the same idea. We know that

1/200 + 1/200 + ... + 1/200 ≥ 1/200 + 1/201 + ... + 1/300 ≥ 1/300 + 1/300 + ... + 1/300

And since there are 100 terms in each, the 1/200 + 1/200 + ... becomes 100 * (1/200), or 1/2.

Likewise, 1/300 + 1/300 + ... becomes 100 * (1/300), or 1/3. So we're left with

1/2 ≥ 1/201 + 1/202 + ... + 1/300 ≥ 1/3
Join the discussion