Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans

Expert replies
by richachampion » Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:48 pm
Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans by deer ticks. Generally,
deer ticks pick up the bacterium while in the larval stage from feeding on infected white-footed mice. However, certain other species on which the larvae feed do not harbor the bacterium. Therefore, if the population of these other species were increased, the number of ticks acquiring the bacterium and hence the number of people contracting Lyme disease would likely decline.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Ticks do not suffer any adverse consequences from carrying the bacterium that causes Lyme disease in humans.
B. There are no known cases of a human’s contracting Lyme disease through contact with white-footed mice.
C. A deer tick feeds only once while in the larval stage.
D. A single host animal can be the source of bacteria for many tick larvae.
E. None of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor other bacteria that ticks transmit to humans.

Intensive discussion has been done here, but I have created a new thread because I was afraid that my question might get lost in that lengthy thread.

My Question:
Is there something like " Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements."
Some of my colleague told me, and I searched on the Internet, but couldn't find that.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Anaira Mitch » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:57 am
" Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements". Such statements are part of LSAT exam I am unsure whether they could be part of GMAT or not but for more info on this you can refer any LSAT book you will find your answer.
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:05 pm
My Question:
Is there something like " Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements."
Some of my colleague told me, and I searched on the Internet, but couldn't find that.
Critical Reasoning always comes down to rigorous logic. My guess is that the distinction here is between two cases.

Case 1: There is an observed correlation between x and y, therefore, someone deduces that x causes y. Here we'd think about the possibility that y might cause x, or that z might cause both. In essence, we're trying to differentiate between causation and mere correlation.

Case 2: If we do x, then y will happen. (Notice the future tense.) We'd treat this type of argument as a simple prediction. Now we're thinking about what factors might make 'y' more or less likely to happen, rather than considering what else could cause y.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion