BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans

Expert replies
by richachampion » Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:48 pm
Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans by deer ticks. Generally,
deer ticks pick up the bacterium while in the larval stage from feeding on infected white-footed mice. However, certain other species on which the larvae feed do not harbor the bacterium. Therefore, if the population of these other species were increased, the number of ticks acquiring the bacterium and hence the number of people contracting Lyme disease would likely decline.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Ticks do not suffer any adverse consequences from carrying the bacterium that causes Lyme disease in humans.
B. There are no known cases of a human's contracting Lyme disease through contact with white-footed mice.
C. A deer tick feeds only once while in the larval stage.
D. A single host animal can be the source of bacteria for many tick larvae.
E. None of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor other bacteria that ticks transmit to humans.

Intensive discussion has been done here, but I have created a new thread because I was afraid that my question might get lost in that lengthy thread.

My Question:
Is there something like " Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements."
Some of my colleague told me, and I searched on the Internet, but couldn't find that.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Anaira Mitch » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:57 am
" Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements". Such statements are part of LSAT exam I am unsure whether they could be part of GMAT or not but for more info on this you can refer any LSAT book you will find your answer.
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:05 pm
My Question:
Is there something like " Predictive causal statements and non-predictive casual statements."
Some of my colleague told me, and I searched on the Internet, but couldn't find that.
Critical Reasoning always comes down to rigorous logic. My guess is that the distinction here is between two cases.

Case 1: There is an observed correlation between x and y, therefore, someone deduces that x causes y. Here we'd think about the possibility that y might cause x, or that z might cause both. In essence, we're trying to differentiate between causation and mere correlation.

Case 2: If we do x, then y will happen. (Notice the future tense.) We'd treat this type of argument as a simple prediction. Now we're thinking about what factors might make 'y' more or less likely to happen, rather than considering what else could cause y.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion