BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Lucretia

Expert replies
by Needgmat » Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:52 am
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women's property laws.

(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights

(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women

(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political
and legal rights

(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political
and legal rights

(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and
legal rights for women

OAE

Whats wrong with options [spoiler]C & D[/spoiler] ?

Please explain.

Thanks in advance,

Kavin
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Needgmat » Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:40 am
Hi Experts ,

Please share your thoughts on this.

Thanks,

Kavin
Join the discussion

by Needgmat » Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:41 am
Hi Experts ,

Please share your thoughts on this.

Thanks,

Kavin
Join the discussion

by Needgmat » Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:58 am
Hi Experts ,

Please share your thoughts on this.

Thanks,

Kavin
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:22 am
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.

(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
This question is testing MODIFIER usage. "Lucretia Mott published her DoW" is an independent clause; the underline begins after that clause must be modifying it.


(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
The participle "arguing" creates an adverbial modifier, modifying the entire clause before it. If this had said "LM published her DoW, arguing for the rights of women." that would have been correct. Here, though, "arguing in a treatise" makes it seem like the "treatise" and the DoW are two different things. The DoW is the treatise, so this is nonsensical.

(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
Same issue as in A.

(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights

"a treatise" properly modifies the DoW. If the sentence ended after this underline, this answer choice would be fine. However, after the underlined portion we have "and for changes..." We need a parallel structure: FOR X and FOR Y.

(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights

Same parallelism issue as in C.

(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

Correct! "... argued FOR ______ and FOR _____" is the correct structure.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by Needgmat » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:25 pm
This question is testing MODIFIER usage. "Lucretia Mott published her DoW" is an independent clause; the underline begins after that clause must be modifying it.


(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
The participle "arguing" creates an adverbial modifier, modifying the entire clause before it. If this had said "LM published her DoW, arguing for the rights of women." that would have been correct. Here, though, "arguing in a treatise" makes it seem like the "treatise" and the DoW are two different things. The DoW is the treatise, so this is nonsensical.

(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
Same issue as in A.

(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights

"a treatise" properly modifies the DoW. If the sentence ended after this underline, this answer choice would be fine. However, after the underlined portion we have "and for changes..." We need a parallel structure: FOR X and FOR Y.

(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights

Same parallelism issue as in C.

(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

Correct! "... argued FOR ______ and FOR _____" is the correct structure.
[/quote]

Hi Ceilidh ,

Thanks for your reply. All clear.

Thanks,

Kavin
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1