BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

LSAT problem example 1: water pollution

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770
by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:20 pm
LSAT problem example 1: water pollution

Here is an example of a good LSAT question to attempt while studying for the GMAT. You can use regular GMAT strategies to address this problem. (Explanation and Official Answer to follow in a later post).


"7. Studies indicate that the rate at which water pollution is increasing is leveling off: the amount of water pollution caused this year is almost identical to the amount caused last year. If this trend continues the water pollution problem will no longer be getting more serious.

The reasoning is questionable because it ignores the possibility that:

A) some types of water pollution have no noticeable effect on organisms that use the water.


B) the types of water pollution caused this year are less dangerous than those caused last year.


C) the leveling off trend of water pollution will not continue.


D) air and soil pollution are becoming more serious.


E) the effects of water pollution are cumulative.


Source: Official LSAT from October 1997, question 7 of section 3. Question found in "10 More Actual , Official PrepTests" copyright Law School Admissions Council, 2007, page 165.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:42 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by G_mater » Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:52 pm
IMO- E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:06 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: India
Thanked: 50 times
GMAT Score:580

by beat_gmat_09 » Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:07 pm
My take -
Conclusion - If this trend continues the water pollution problem will no longer be getting more serious.
Premise - Studies indicate that the rate at which water pollution is increasing is leveling off
Premise -the amount of water pollution caused this year is almost identical to the amount caused last year.
Conclusion is conditional, if the trend continues, so assuming that the trend continues we have to find another possibility which weakens the argument.
A - Some types of water pollutants and noticeable effects on organisms. Doesn't help, cannot distinguish between "serious" and unnoticeable effects.
B - Tends to strengthen.
C - Assumption is that the trend continues, can be ruled out.
D - Not relevant.
E - Correct. If the problem is cumulative then water pollution, when the trend continues, will be a bigger problem.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:09 pm
David@VeritasPrep wrote:LSAT problem example 1: water pollution

Here is an example of a good LSAT question to attempt while studying for the GMAT. You can use regular GMAT strategies to address this problem. (Explanation and Official Answer to follow in a later post).


"7. Studies indicate that the rate at which water pollution is increasing is leveling off: the amount of water pollution caused this year is almost identical to the amount caused last year. If this trend continues the water pollution problem will no longer be getting more serious.

The reasoning is questionable because it ignores the possibility that:

A) some types of water pollution have no noticeable effect on organisms that use the water.


B) the types of water pollution caused this year are less dangerous than those caused last year.


C) the leveling off trend of water pollution will not continue.


D) air and soil pollution are becoming more serious.


E) the effects of water pollution are cumulative.


Source: Official LSAT from October 1997, question 7 of section 3. Question found in "10 More Actual , Official PrepTests" copyright Law School Admissions Council, 2007, page 165.
yes E too....L(
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:47 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by gtr02 » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:12 pm
Got it down to B & E, chose B. Not sure about "the effects" in choice E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pmFollowed by: 512 members
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:13 am
OA is E.

Beat GMAT 09 has given a great explanation above (no need to duplicate that!). So I will comment on the general points to take away from this.

First, I think that this question translates very well from the LSAT to the GMAT (that was actually the point of this posting -- to give an example of the type of question that you should be looking to use when studying).

Second, let's look at the question stem....This question stem states: "The reasoning is questionable because it ignores the possibility that" in the Veritas Critical Reasoning 2 book we classify this as a subtype of the Weaken question. In some cases the "flaw" type of question will ask you to describe the flaw in abstract language, such as "the argument ignores the possibility of an alternate cause." In this case the answer choices are the standard weaken choices that state facts that would weaken the conclusion.

GTR_02 - Answer Choice E states that the "effects" of water pollution are cumulative and it is the "effects" part that you were concerned about. However, the effects ties in very well with the conclusion, which states "If this trend continues the water pollution problem will no longer be getting more serious." The word problem is the key here. The water pollution "problem" sounds very much like the result of the "effects" of the water pollution. You are very correct to look for the specific words, in this case they seem to fit.

Nice work!!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1