BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT--Democracies

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:20 am
Some argue that because attaining governmental power
in democracies requires building majority coalitions, it
is a necessary evil that policymakers do not adhere
rigorously to principle when dealing with important
issues, but rather shift policies as they try to please
different constituents at different times. But it is
precisely this behavior that allows a democracy to
adapt more easily to serve public interests, and thus it
is more a benefit than an evil.
Which one of the following is an assumption required
by the argument?
(A) Government policymakers cannot retain power
if they ignore any of the various factions of
their original winning coalition.
(B) Democracies are more likely than nondemocratic
forms of government to have policymakers
who understand the complexity of
governmental issues.
(C) In the formulation of government policy, the
advantage conferred by adaptability to diverse
or fluctuating public interests outweighs the
detriment associated with a lack of strict
fidelity to principle.
(D) In dealing with an important issue, policymakers
in a democracy appeal to a principle in dealing
with an issue only when that principle has
majority support.
(E) Democracies appear to be more flexible than
nondemocratic forms of government, but are
not actually so.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by outreach » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:10 am
C
what is the OA?
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by Phirozz » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:34 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:05 am
IMO -- D
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:08 pm
OA is C...any explanations please??

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by deepak4mba » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:42 pm
Close Call between C and D.
IMO C.

Reason: The statement gives the evil side of democracy but then says it to be beneficial w/o concrete support statements. Hence, the statement in the assumption should be on the positive side. C and D only come close to it. I choose C because only C speaks how policies can be tweaked to adaptability circumstances whereas D speaks of sticking strictly to a single opinion only.

Time: 01:35
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:01 pm
deepak4mba wrote:Close Call between C and D.
IMO C.

Reason: The statement gives the evil side of democracy but then says it to be beneficial w/o concrete support statements. Hence, the statement in the assumption should be on the positive side. C and D only come close to it. I choose C because only C speaks how policies can be tweaked to adaptability circumstances whereas D speaks of sticking strictly to a single opinion only.

Time: 01:35
Adding to what deepak said correctly,

The language 'only when' in D is on the extreme side.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Mon May 16, 2016 12:13 am
I feel the answer will be C
Join the discussion