LSAT CR

Expert replies

sohrabkalra: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 90; Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:56 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 1 times; GMAT Score:770

by sohrabkalra » Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:14 am

The folktale that claims that a rattlesnakes age can be determined from the no of sections in its rattle is false, but only because the rattles are brittle and and sometimes partially or completely break off. So , if they were not so brittle one could reliably determine a rattlesnakes age simply from the number of sections in its rattle, because one new section is formed each time a rattlesnake molts

which of the following is an assumption the argument requires in order for the conclusion to be properly drawn ?

A) Rattlesnakes molt exactly once a year
B) The rattles of rattlsnakes of different species are identical
C)Rattlesnakes molt more frequently when young than old
D) The brittleness of a rattlesnakes rattle is not correlated with the length of a rattlesnakes life
E) Rattlesnakes molt as often when food is scarce as they do when food is plentiful

Wil post the OA after a few replies !

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:14 am

Ananthakrishnan: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 5; Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:23 pm; Thanked: 1 times

by Ananthakrishnan » Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:24 am

Number of sections in the rattle --> age of rattle snake

1 new section is formed each time a rattle sname molts.

The missing link in the above statements is the link between the age of the snake and the number of times the molt occurs in a year.

Option A bridges that gap clearly.

IMO - Option A
Official answer please?

Ananthakrishnan: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 5; Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:23 pm; Thanked: 1 times

by Ananthakrishnan » Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:25 am

HSPA: Legendary Member; Posts: 1101; Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members; Thanked: 47 times; GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:18 am

A looks more like a trap . IMO D

First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Luke.Doolittle: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 42; Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 5 members; Location: Madison, WI; Thanked: 23 times; GMAT Score:770

by Luke.Doolittle » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:07 am

(A) is a trap answer. Invert it and you will see why.

"Rattlesnakes do not molt exactly once per year"

This doesn't weaken the conclusion. They could molt twice per year and the conclusion would still follow from the premises.

Now try inverting (E)

"Rattlesnakes do not molt as often when food is scarce..."

The argument states that "if they were not so brittle one could reliably determine a rattlesnakes age simply from...". Put another way this indicates the age is determined only by the number of sections. Thus the inverted version of (E) gives a reason to doubt this conclusion; there is another reason, other than age, that determines the number of sections in a rattle.

Example: take two snakes, the same age, one has had an abundant food supply its entire life and one not. The snake with the abundant food supply will have more sections despite being the same age.

Its all about your process

https://www.beatthegmat.com/770-50q-46v- ... tml#425217

XLogic: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 127; Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:55 amFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 17 times

by XLogic » Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:48 pm

This is the famous "Rattle Snake" problem! One of the most feared in all of LSAT.
Notice I said LSAT, because this is not a GMAT CR question.

LSAT requires you to make clear distinctions between necessary and sufficient assumptions. GMAT CR not so much. Therefore, I'm not convinced that posting necessary assumption questions -- LSAT questions for that matter -- will benefit this forum.

I can be dissuaded

my post helped --> thank me!
don't thank me --> my post = what the..??

sohrabkalra: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 90; Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:56 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 1 times; GMAT Score:770

by sohrabkalra » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:52 pm

Thanks Luke , Nice explanation !

I did the same mistake as ananth of interpreting " a rattlesnakes age can be determined from the no of sections in its rattle " AS "Rattlesnakes age = No of sections "

Hence, i eliminated E as in that case it would have had infact weakened the conclusion !

OA is E

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review