BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT CR

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:56 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:770
by sohrabkalra » Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:14 am
The folktale that claims that a rattlesnakes age can be determined from the no of sections in its rattle is false, but only because the rattles are brittle and and sometimes partially or completely break off. So , if they were not so brittle one could reliably determine a rattlesnakes age simply from the number of sections in its rattle, because one new section is formed each time a rattlesnake molts

which of the following is an assumption the argument requires in order for the conclusion to be properly drawn ?

A) Rattlesnakes molt exactly once a year
B) The rattles of rattlsnakes of different species are identical
C)Rattlesnakes molt more frequently when young than old
D) The brittleness of a rattlesnakes rattle is not correlated with the length of a rattlesnakes life
E) Rattlesnakes molt as often when food is scarce as they do when food is plentiful

Wil post the OA after a few replies !
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:23 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Ananthakrishnan » Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:24 am
Number of sections in the rattle --> age of rattle snake

1 new section is formed each time a rattle sname molts.

The missing link in the above statements is the link between the age of the snake and the number of times the molt occurs in a year.

Option A bridges that gap clearly.

IMO - Option A
Official answer please?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:23 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Ananthakrishnan » Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:25 am
Number of sections in the rattle --> age of rattle snake

1 new section is formed each time a rattle sname molts.

The missing link in the above statements is the link between the age of the snake and the number of times the molt occurs in a year.

Option A bridges that gap clearly.

IMO - Option A
Official answer please?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:18 am
A looks more like a trap . IMO D
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 23 times
GMAT Score:770

by Luke.Doolittle » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:07 am
(A) is a trap answer. Invert it and you will see why.

"Rattlesnakes do not molt exactly once per year"

This doesn't weaken the conclusion. They could molt twice per year and the conclusion would still follow from the premises.

Now try inverting (E)

"Rattlesnakes do not molt as often when food is scarce..."

The argument states that "if they were not so brittle one could reliably determine a rattlesnakes age simply from...". Put another way this indicates the age is determined only by the number of sections. Thus the inverted version of (E) gives a reason to doubt this conclusion; there is another reason, other than age, that determines the number of sections in a rattle.

Example: take two snakes, the same age, one has had an abundant food supply its entire life and one not. The snake with the abundant food supply will have more sections despite being the same age.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:55 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 17 times

by XLogic » Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:48 pm
This is the famous "Rattle Snake" problem! One of the most feared in all of LSAT.
Notice I said LSAT, because this is not a GMAT CR question.

LSAT requires you to make clear distinctions between necessary and sufficient assumptions. GMAT CR not so much. Therefore, I'm not convinced that posting necessary assumption questions -- LSAT questions for that matter -- will benefit this forum.

I can be dissuaded :-)
my post helped --> thank me!
don't thank me --> my post = what the..??
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:56 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:770

by sohrabkalra » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:52 pm
Thanks Luke , Nice explanation !

I did the same mistake as ananth of interpreting " a rattlesnakes age can be determined from the no of sections in its rattle " AS "Rattlesnakes age = No of sections "

Hence, i eliminated E as in that case it would have had infact weakened the conclusion !

OA is E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1