Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

LSAT CR

Expert replies
by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:09 am
During the nineteenth century, the French academy of
art was a major financial sponsor of painting and
sculpture in France; sponsorship by private individuals
had decreased dramatically by this time. Because the
academy discouraged innovation in the arts, there was
little innovation in nineteenth century French sculpture.
Yet nineteenth century French painting showed a
remarkable degree of innovation.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to
explain the difference between the amount of
innovation in French painting and the amount of
innovation in French sculpture during the nineteenth
century?
(A) In France in the nineteenth century, the French
academy gave more of its financial support to
painting than it did to sculpture.
(B) The French academy in the nineteenth century
financially supported a greater number of
sculptors than painters, but individual painters
received more support, on average, than
individual sculptors.
(C) Because stone was so much more expensive
than paint and canvas, far more unsponsored
paintings were produced than were
unsponsored sculptures in France during the
nineteenth century.
(D) Very few of the artists in France in the
nineteenth century who produced sculptures
also produced paintings.
(E) Although the academy was the primary sponsor
of sculpture and painting, the total amount of
financial support that French sculptors and
painters received from sponsors declined
during the nineteenth century.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:17 am
I would choose C. I says that sculpting material was expensive for the academy to support, but painting material was not expensive and so obtainable, although the academy did not support paintings.
Join the discussion

by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:23 am
Why not A?? OA is C
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:51 am
punitkaur wrote:Why not A?? OA is C
Passage says:

During the nineteenth century, the French academy of
art was a major financial sponsor of painting and
sculpture in France

passage says:

Because the academy discouraged innovations in arts.


from those two, conclude that the academy was a sponsor of art, which included both sculpting and painting, and when it discouraged innovations in arts, it did so for both branches of art.
This makes sense because later in the passage we find out that sculpting decreased while painting increased, and that makes a paradoxical situation, making the question valid.
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:07 pm
IMO C too.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:47 pm
Join the discussion

by getso » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:17 am
Premise 1: During the nineteenth century, the French academy of art was a major financial sponsor of painting and sculpture in France
Premise 2: sponsorship by private individuals had decreased dramatically by this time.
Premise 3: Because the academy discouraged innovation in the arts, there was little innovation in nineteenth century French sculpture. Yet nineteenth century French painting showed a remarkable degree of innovation.

The paradox is though both the arts i.e painting and sculptor received sponsorship from French academy painting showed a remarkable degree of innovation whereas sculpture showed little innovation.

A>If this was true then there is no paradox at all. Painting received more patronage and hence greater innovation. Hence A cannot be the correct answer.

C is the correct answer. It clearly resolves the paradox pointing to the fact that stones needed for sculpture were more expensive when compared to canvas.Hence painting had greater degree of innovation.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:31 am
here is my explanation

qtn says...if academy sponsored something then it should not have innovation..

so if innovation is there in something... this means sponsorship was not there for that thing..

This is explained in C
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:27 pm
The official answer is C. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain
Join the discussion