BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT CR

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:48 pm
Thanked: 6 times
by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:58 am
Philosopher: An action is morally right if it would be
reasonably expected to increase the aggregate
well-being of the people affected by it. An action
is morally wrong if and only if it would be
reasonably expected to reduce the aggregate wellbeing
of the people affected by it. Thus, actions
that would be reasonably expected to leave
unchanged the aggregate well-being of the people
affected by them are also right.
The philosopher's conclusion follows logically if which
one of the following is assumed?
(A) Only wrong actions would be reasonably
expected to reduce the aggregate well-being of
the people affected by them.
(B) No action is both right and wrong.
(C) Any action that is not morally wrong is morally
right.
(D) There are actions that would be reasonably
expected to leave unchanged the aggregate
well-being of the people affected by them.
(E) Only right actions have good consequences.

Confused between A and C. Can someone explain how to negate the options.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:20 am
It is C. Good effect = right, no effect = right, bad effect = wrong. So, any action that does not have a negative effect is morally right.

Per Testluv, negation is hard and might not work in sufficient assumption, which asks about the assumption used to draw the conclusion.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:48 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:31 am
Hi Hesham,

While C looked good to me as well. how did you eliminate A?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:40 am
punitkaur wrote:Hi Hesham,

While C looked good to me as well. how did you eliminate A?

The passage compares the effects of actions only. it does not state whether an action that is morally right is a right or wrong action. So, maybe an action that the writer considers wrong is morally right because it will have apositive effect on people or no negative effect, and vice versa.

For example, charging people for smoking and drinking alcohol is morally right according to the philosopher, but it is the wrong action. Although it is the wrong action, it is morally right, because it increases people's well being.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:03 pm
IMO D. What is the reason for eliminating D ?
Think A is out, because it is stated in the argument itself.
What is OA ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:39 am
GMAT Score:620

by gmat620 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:50 pm
A is wrong because any action which is expected to reduce the aggregate well being of ppl will automatically fall into category of wrong action by definition.



Wrong Action definition:
An action
is morally wrong if and only if it would be
reasonably expected to reduce the aggregate wellbeing
of the people affected by it.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

by getso » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:48 pm
Premise 1:An action is morally right if it would be reasonably expected to increase the aggregate well-being of the people affected by it.

Premise 2:An action is morally wrong if and only if it would be reasonably expected to reduce the aggregate wellbeing
of the people affected by it

Conclusion: Actions that would be reasonably expected to leave unchanged the aggregate well-being of the people
affected by them are also right

So the here author is assuming that any action/no actions that does not affect the aggregate well being are right.

C paraphrases the same Any action that is not morally wrong is morally right.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:36 pm
Looking at it now, C makes sense
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1