Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

LSAT CR

Expert replies
by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:51 am
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics
thoroughly, and local political business is usually
conducted secretively. These factors each tend to
isolate local politicians from their electorates.
This has the effect of reducing the chance that
any particular act of resident participation will
elicit a positive official response, which in turn
discourages resident participation in local politics.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported
by the editorialist’s statements?
(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be
likely to elicit a positive response from local
politicians if those politicians were less isolated
from their electorate.
(B) Local political business should be conducted
less secretively because this would avoid
discouraging resident participation in local
politics.
(C) The most important factor influencing a
resident’s decision as to whether to participate
in local politics is the chance that the
participation will elicit a positive official
response.
(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local
politics would reduce at least one source of
discouragement from resident participation in
local politics.
(E) If resident participation in local politics were
not discouraged, this would cause local
politicians to be less isolated from their
electorate.

Confused between A and D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nakul_anand » Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:50 pm
I was actually confused between B and D. I would go with D because less frequent thorough coverage isolates local politicians from their electorates.

This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response,

which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

So I think that more-frequent thorough coverage will reduce atleast one source of discouragement.

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by papgust » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:15 pm
IMO it should be D

A. "Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate" - It mentions that "..to elicit a positive response from local politicians.." which is not supported in the stimuli. Stimuli states only the positive official response.

B. "Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics." - this is not the cause for the mentioned effect. This is also one of the 2 factors to cause an effect.

C. "The most important factor influencing a resident's decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response." - The stimuli never mentions that it is the most important factor for a resident's decision.

D. "More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics." - Although it mentions only one of the 2 factors as a cause, it mentioned the word "at least". This is the correct choice.

E. "If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate." - This is a reversed cause and effect.
Join the discussion

by punitkaur » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:00 am
OA is D. Thanks for your explanations.
Join the discussion