BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT CR

Expert replies
by punitkaur » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:51 am
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics
thoroughly, and local political business is usually
conducted secretively. These factors each tend to
isolate local politicians from their electorates.
This has the effect of reducing the chance that
any particular act of resident participation will
elicit a positive official response, which in turn
discourages resident participation in local politics.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported
by the editorialist's statements?
(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be
likely to elicit a positive response from local
politicians if those politicians were less isolated
from their electorate.
(B) Local political business should be conducted
less secretively because this would avoid
discouraging resident participation in local
politics.
(C) The most important factor influencing a
resident's decision as to whether to participate
in local politics is the chance that the
participation will elicit a positive official
response.
(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local
politics would reduce at least one source of
discouragement from resident participation in
local politics.
(E) If resident participation in local politics were
not discouraged, this would cause local
politicians to be less isolated from their
electorate.

Confused between A and D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nakul_anand » Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:50 pm
I was actually confused between B and D. I would go with D because less frequent thorough coverage isolates local politicians from their electorates.

This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response,

which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

So I think that more-frequent thorough coverage will reduce atleast one source of discouragement.

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by papgust » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:15 pm
IMO it should be D

A. "Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate" - It mentions that "..to elicit a positive response from local politicians.." which is not supported in the stimuli. Stimuli states only the positive official response.

B. "Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics." - this is not the cause for the mentioned effect. This is also one of the 2 factors to cause an effect.

C. "The most important factor influencing a resident's decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response." - The stimuli never mentions that it is the most important factor for a resident's decision.

D. "More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics." - Although it mentions only one of the 2 factors as a cause, it mentioned the word "at least". This is the correct choice.

E. "If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate." - This is a reversed cause and effect.
Join the discussion

by punitkaur » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:00 am
OA is D. Thanks for your explanations.
Join the discussion