BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT CR

Expert replies
by gmat740 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:24 pm
Please explain
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cramya » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:34 pm
I would go with E.

IMO Basically the argument is saying that famous personalities get away with community service because of their fame and publicity when compared to non celebrities who have done similar crime.

From bothe the statemensts together the author is trying to convey that the law must be equal for all and no leniency based on certain considerations must be allowed.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:55 pm
OA is D

my answer was C

E was out at the first go itself
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:56 pm
Kaplan explaination for E

(E) Leniency is a new and ambiguous term, which is a good reason to kill this choice right
off the bat. For all we know, the principle of equality before the law is compatible with
leniency; nothing forbids this, so (E) isn’t the conclusion we seek
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:08 pm
Good question.

I jumped in to the conclusion that many in D is extreme but thinking about it more many types could correlate to many cases so D could be right in that respect.

Would u be kind enough to post Kaplan's explanation or a paraphrase for D?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:14 pm
Kaplan Explaination:
When we need to infer a conclusion from the stimulus, it’s best to think about where the
argument is leading. It pays to be famous: According to the first sentence, celebrities
convicted of crimes are increasingly being sentenced to community service, whereas
unknown convicts almost always get locked up for the same crimes. Doesn’t sound very
fair, does it? Next, we find out that the principle of equality before the law does not permit
celebrity status to affect the sentencing of criminals. This principle seems to directly
conflict with the example in the first sentence. If, in fact, celebrities are getting off easier
because of their celebrity status, then some judges out there aren’t paying much attention
to the principle of equality before the law. That’s the one solid conclusion that’s inferable
from the passage. Some of the punishments described in the first sentence conflict with the
principle described in the second, and it seems as though the author stopped just short of
presenting the conclusion contained in choice (D).

I am not able to understand how to kick out C
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:25 pm
I think C says properly being overridden and the argument speaks against this by saying it is not so. reducing the punsihment to acommunity service on the grounds of publicity or one being famous is not a principle.

I was thinking Kaplan might give more explanation on the word MANY i.e many cases in choice D to many types of crimes in the argument.


For example there could be many types of cases but only 100 of them involving celebrities whereas there could one type of case but 1000 of them involving non celebrities.


I think Stuart could help us with this if he happens to see this post.


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:39 pm
I did pm stuart

Lets wait for his explanation
Join the discussion

by anshulseth » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:29 am
The word "properly be overridden" rules out C.
As it can't properly be overridden, but is improperly overridden in celebrity cases.

In D, "many cases" just implies its rampant.
Asset
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sun May 15, 2016 2:00 am
In my opinion C is the most appropriate answer
Join the discussion