Please explain
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer
Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
When we need to infer a conclusion from the stimulus, it’s best to think about where the
argument is leading. It pays to be famous: According to the first sentence, celebrities
convicted of crimes are increasingly being sentenced to community service, whereas
unknown convicts almost always get locked up for the same crimes. Doesn’t sound very
fair, does it? Next, we find out that the principle of equality before the law does not permit
celebrity status to affect the sentencing of criminals. This principle seems to directly
conflict with the example in the first sentence. If, in fact, celebrities are getting off easier
because of their celebrity status, then some judges out there aren’t paying much attention
to the principle of equality before the law. That’s the one solid conclusion that’s inferable
from the passage. Some of the punishments described in the first sentence conflict with the
principle described in the second, and it seems as though the author stopped just short of
presenting the conclusion contained in choice (D).