BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LSAT CR 2

Expert replies
by gmat740 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:53 pm
Here another one,

Hint: try to read between the lines and have broader view rather than to stick on to a specific thing

OA after few responses
Attachments
sterlization-B.JPG
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cramya » Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:46 pm
Yikes....

I would go with [spoiler]B)[/spoiler] since it says each complete sterlization required more enery than the nergy required to produce the entire set (atleast from what I understand). If this was the case it would be more than 3.4 times

The others could be true IMO.


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by blackarrow » Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:59 pm
IMO C

Only option could be false. Nothing in the argument supports it

All others could be true if the manufacturing and sterlization cost is taken together. Thus could be true. [/quote]
Its better to burn out than to fade away
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:56 pm
@Cramya

You got it correct this time!!
congrats

OA B
Join the discussion

by kanha81 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:32 pm
gmat740 wrote:@Cramya

You got it correct this time!!
congrats

OA B
Can you please explain? I was able to eliminate 3 choices and between and [C], I chose [C].
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by snsubbu » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:14 am
Hi

am a little confused.

If the answer is B, then it means it is not true. But the question clearly says says each complete sterlization required more enery than the nergy required to produce the entire set .This makes is B the only statement as TRUE and others as FALSE.

Can someone pls explain? :?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:08 am
Official Explanation:
First, note that the question asks for the one thing that cannot be true. Next,
draw out the information the stimulus gives — and doesn’t give. There are two sets of
instruments; the same procedures are done to each; and the procedures yield similar
results. It takes more energy to sterilize a set of these instruments than it does to
manufacture them. But we don’t know how many instruments make up each set, nor do we know exactly how much energy it takes to manufacture either set. It could take more to
make nylon tools, or it could take more to make stainless steel, or it could take equal
amounts of energy for both. We just don’t know. Unfortunately there’s no way to predict
the answer here. It’s just a matter of slogging through the choices until you find the right
one.
(A) could be true. If the same amount of energy was required to manufacture both the
nylon and the steel instruments, then sterilizing the nylon instruments would have been
more energy consuming than sterilizing the steel. (B), however, can’t be true, and yes, it
takes a little math-thinking, but that’s life. (You could have skipped this choice and
checked out the others; if all of them can be true, then (B) must be correct whether or not
you understand why.) If 50 complete sterilizations of the nylon instruments took 3.4 times
the energy to make that set, then they should be able to do roughly 15 sterilizations with
the same energy as manufacture. One complete sterilization, then, must have taken far less
than the energy of manufacture. (C) could be true; as we noted above, we don’t know how
many types of instrument appear in each kit, so there could be more nylon instruments
than steel. Since both kits were sterilized an equal number of times, more nylon instruments could have been sterilized. (D) absolutely could be true, since we don’t know how much energy was required to produce either set. (E) is also quite possible. If materials are cheap, and energy is very expensive, then using far more energy to sterilize than manufacture steel instruments could make sterilizing them more expensive than making them in the first place
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Sun May 15, 2016 3:04 am
I would go with option B as the correct option
Join the discussion