BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Low Quant Score, high GPA.

Launched January 9, 2010
Expert replies
by hypermeganet » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:19 pm
Hello,

I am about to submit my R2 applications and I wanted to just run something by you guys before hitting the button.

I took the GMAT on Saturday (1/9) and scored a 680...but my breakdown was a 39Q, 44V. I had some extenuating circumstances (basically there was a loud jackhammer running for a portion of my quant section that disrupted my concentration pretty badly). I don't know how much of a difference it made, really, as I was testing in the 42-44Q and a 43-46V...so I wasn't super far off of my averages.

Basically, I will explain this in the optional essay and point to my quant undergrad work, consulting internship that required me to understand fairly complex engineering work, and post grad courses in accounting and finance at Wharton. I want to know how much of a killer you think it will be in my apps or if it will be less of an issue than I think. I'm applying to Stern, Texas, and USC.

Some other background: 3.83 overall GPA (and a 4.0 in my 2 Wharton postbacc classes) in a science major from an Ivy.
2 year internship and 1 year full-time doing business consulting work (energy focus) at NGO.
2 years of cash management operations at top investment management firm.

Also, I am considering an application to UCLA and MIT, but am I too far out of their league to be considered for R3?
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Veritas Prep Admissions Consulting |

by Scott@VeritasPrep » Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:39 am
Hi hypermeganet,

I don't think a 680 (even with that pretty low quant score) will be an automatic deal breaker that those schools. I think you can also still apply to Anderson and Sloan with a 680. I would just be careful not to come off as sounding too much like you're making excuses in your optional essay. Adcomms can start to lose patience when they're presented with a lot of "But it's not my fault, I can explain, etc., so tread carefully here. I do think you're doing the right thing by highlighting the other parts of your profile that highlight your analytical abilities -- your job and your postgraduate work.

Note that I said ANALYTICAL abilities, not quant abilities... Admissions officers don't just want a number cruncher, but rather someone who can assess a potentially murky situation, pull out the facts that matter, and make a decision based on that information. Your quant abilities will showcase this skill, but they're just part of the story.

It's water under the bridge now, but I have to ask: Did you tell anyone at the testing center abut the noise problem while it was happening?

Scott
Join the discussion

by hypermeganet » Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:56 pm
VP_Scott wrote:Hi hypermeganet,

I don't think a 680 (even with that pretty low quant score) will be an automatic deal breaker that those schools. I think you can also still apply to Anderson and Sloan with a 680. I would just be careful not to come off as sounding too much like you're making excuses in your optional essay. Adcomms can start to lose patience when they're presented with a lot of "But it's not my fault, I can explain, etc., so tread carefully here. I do think you're doing the right thing by highlighting the other parts of your profile that highlight your analytical abilities -- your job and your postgraduate work.

Note that I said ANALYTICAL abilities, not quant abilities... Admissions officers don't just want a number cruncher, but rather someone who can assess a potentially murky situation, pull out the facts that matter, and make a decision based on that information. Your quant abilities will showcase this skill, but they're just part of the story.

It's water under the bridge now, but I have to ask: Did you tell anyone at the testing center abut the noise problem while it was happening?

Scott
I said something right after the section during the break before the verbal part. I didn't say anything during the exam because I was worried that they would just offer me to take it again another time and I didn't have time to do redo it before the R2 deadline. I was told I had to contact Pearson's customer service...and I did so right after the exam. The email I received back said:

"you did not say anything immediately during the exam and we cannot offer you any resolution. We are closing your case." So, yeah, that was awesome.

We'll see how I do with those schools. I hope I have a good shot at Texas and USC. I think NYU is a bit more numbers heavy...but I think I made my case well with them, too.
Join the discussion

by Scott@VeritasPrep » Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:05 am
That sucks... Sorry to hear it! But I still think that it won't completely take you out of the running.

Good luck,
Scott
Join the discussion