BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Low calorie sweetners

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:55 am
I believer that option A is also weakining the argument......Am I right?.....

Please explain this one


Statistics show that although consumption of
low-calorie, alternative sweeteners has gone up
in each of the past five years, so has the
percentage of the population that is obese.
According to sugar manufacturers, this shows
that the low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are
not effective weight loss aids.
Which of the following assertions, if true, would
most weaken the sugar manufacturers'
conclusion?

(A) Many people who use low-calorie,
alternative sweeteners eat some foods
that are not low-calorie.
(B) Some low-calorie, alternative sweeteners
can increase the appetite, making a
person eat more than he or she normally
would.
(C) Many people use low-calorie, alternative
sweeteners to accompany a wellbalanced,
low-calorie diet.
(D) Obesity has declined among people who
have consistently used low-calorie,
alternative sweeteners.
(E) The rise in the consumption of low-calorie,
alternative sweeteners is primarily due to
an increase in the number of users rather
than an increase in the amount each user
consume
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by T11 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:03 am
Hi,

The stimulus says that consumption of low cal sweetners has gone up and at the same time the % of of the population that is obese has also gone up. But the stimulus does not say anything about the results amongst those who actually took the sweetner. So there is a missing premise. In other words, the incresase in the % of obese people could be from that set of the population which did not use the sweetner.

Hence, its option D because it directly links the consumption of low cal sweetners to the results. "Obesity has declined among people who
have consistently used low-calorie,
alternative sweeteners".

What's the OA?

T
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:06 am
A isn't a strong weakener because of the words "many" and "some," both of which are too vague to have any significant impact on the argument. How many is "many"? Five? Five hundred? Five million? Without knowing, it doesn't do us much good. And "some" can mean anything from one to all... that's even less helpful to us than "many." And finally, it seems safe to say that pretty much everyone eats some foods that are not low-calorie; whether or not that's true, though, it's not relevant to whether or not the sweeteners themselves are good weight-loss aids.

I believe that the answer here is D, because if obesity has declined among the low-calorie sweetener users, then those sweeteners probably ARE good weight-loss aids, and the increase in obesity in the population as a whole must come from other people.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:08 am
OA is D....

Thanks Andrea...I got this one....

Cheers!
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:18 am
argument does not says that the percentage of obesity is increased among the consumer of alternative sweeteners.
argument does not show direct relation between alternative sweeteners and obese population increase i.e if the options can show that obese population has other reason to increase or alternative sweeteners has any effect on obesity the conclution will be weakened.Only option D does that.

IMO ans should be D
can you please confirm or explain if it is not.
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:20 am
liferocks wrote:argument does not says that the percentage of obesity is increased among the consumer of alternative sweeteners.
argument does not show direct relation between alternative sweeteners and obese population increase i.e if the options can show that obese population has other reason to increase or alternative sweeteners has any effect on obesity the conclution will be weakened.Only option D does that.

IMO ans should be D
can you please confirm or explain if it is not.
sorry didn't see the other posts before posting.got the ans.
Join the discussion