BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees

Expert replies
by pnk » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:35 am
Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official's argument?

(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.

[spoiler]LSAT; OA later[/spoiler] Pls give explanations & if possible time taken to solve
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albatross86 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:23 am
Time taken: 50 seconds

Summary of the argument:
Trees from old-growth forests can be harvested for use in manufacture - this will reduce atmospheric CO2 since
1. when such large old trees die they decompose and release CO2.
2. this would make room for young fast-growing trees which absorb more CO2.

WEAKENER

A. Animals would be endangered - irrelevant to argument which is about CO2 specifically.

B. Most of the organic matter from old trees is unusable as lumber and is made into products that decompose rapidly - EXACTLY - this weakens our argument which says that CO2 will be reduced due to this decomposing being avoided. However even after manufacturing processes, if the products made from such trees themselves decompose, this CO2 will be released anyway, thus weakening the justification.

C. This supports point 2 and seems to strengthen rather than weaken.

D. This simply restates that wood/debris decompose to release CO2 - this doesn't weaken the argument that harvesting old trees could reduce CO2 levels.

E. Young trees take many years to reach the size of old trees - so what? What has this got to do with the CO2 levels?

Pick B.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion

by pnk » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:21 am
albatross86 wrote:Time taken: 50 seconds

Summary of the argument:
Trees from old-growth forests can be harvested for use in manufacture - this will reduce atmospheric CO2 since
1. when such large old trees die they decompose and release CO2.
2. this would make room for young fast-growing trees which absorb more CO2.

WEAKENER

A. Animals would be endangered - irrelevant to argument which is about CO2 specifically.

B. Most of the organic matter from old trees is unusable as lumber and is made into products that decompose rapidly - EXACTLY - this weakens our argument which says that CO2 will be reduced due to this decomposing being avoided. However even after manufacturing processes, if the products made from such trees themselves decompose, this CO2 will be released anyway, thus weakening the justification.

C. This supports point 2 and seems to strengthen rather than weaken.

D. This simply restates that wood/debris decompose to release CO2 - this doesn't weaken the argument that harvesting old trees could reduce CO2 levels.

E. Young trees take many years to reach the size of old trees - so what? What has this got to do with the CO2 levels?

Pick B.
Thanks Abhay; Great explanation OA - B
Join the discussion