BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Liver Disorder in rats

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 amFollowed by: 47 members
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
by komal » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:46 pm
A certain laboratory is studying the incidence of fatal liver damage in rats. Sixty-five percent of all rats whose environments exposed them to low levels of the toxin sulfur dioxide died of liver disorder. Ninety percent of all rats who died of liver disorder, however, were not exposed to any environmental toxins
Which of the following would provide a feasible explanation for the statistics above?
(A) Environmental and nonenvironmental causes of liver disease in rats are mutually exclusive.
(B) There is only one cause of fatal liver disease in rats.
(C) Environmental toxins are not particularly dangerous to the livers of rats.
(D) Only a small portion of the entire group of rats studied was exposed to environmental sulfur dioxide.
(E) Most rats will not suffer from exposure to low levels of sulfur dioxide

OA D
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pmFollowed by: 79 members
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:24 pm
Ah I chose C... but D is definitely the obvious answer jumping out at me... because of the subset of rats... 60% were exposed... and since it was a subset it's smaller etc etc blah blah
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pmFollowed by: 22 members
Thanked: 98 times

by fibbonnaci » Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:45 am
say 100 rats dies due to liver damage.
so according to the stimulus- 90 rats were not exposed to envi toxins.
the 10 rats which were exposed to toxin constitute 65% of the rats exposed to envi toxins ie approx 15 rats were exposed.
so we know the total number of rats studied was greater than 100.

Now lets look at options.
(A) Environmental and nonenvironmental causes of liver disease in rats are mutually exclusive. [causes is wrong. we have checked for only one envi toxin. so we cannot generalize. Eliminated!]

(B) There is only one cause of fatal liver disease in rats. [we dont know. we are not given info about it. we have stimulus dealing with just one cause. that does not mean there is only one cause. Eliminated!]

(C) Environmental toxins are not particularly dangerous to the livers of rats. [if they are not dangerous then why will 65% of the rats exposed to them die? Eliminated!]

(D) Only a small portion of the entire group of rats studied was exposed to environmental sulfur dioxide. [Bingo. 15 out of a number greater than 100 is a small portion. Correct!]

(E) Most rats will not suffer from exposure to low levels of sulfur dioxide [how can we talk about most rats when we ourselves in the experiment subject only 15 rats out of more than 100 rats?? Eliminated!]

Hope this helps!
Top
Join the discussion