Hello.
In question 82 of verbal review 2, OG explanation says that "the areas described would suffer from both little water and few services at the same time, so the correct conjunction is and, not or".
The below is modified version of the sentence:
"the new law permits fewer people to live in areas where there are little water or few services.
I know that "and" and "or" convey different meanings, but I do not see any illogical meaning if we use "or" instead of "and".
Please explain what the illogical meaning is if we use "or".
---------
is the below sentence redundant? I think "there are" and "available" convey the same meaning.
"there are little water and few services available"
Thank you.
In question 82 of verbal review 2, OG explanation says that "the areas described would suffer from both little water and few services at the same time, so the correct conjunction is and, not or".
The below is modified version of the sentence:
"the new law permits fewer people to live in areas where there are little water or few services.
I know that "and" and "or" convey different meanings, but I do not see any illogical meaning if we use "or" instead of "and".
Please explain what the illogical meaning is if we use "or".
---------
is the below sentence redundant? I think "there are" and "available" convey the same meaning.
"there are little water and few services available"
Thank you.
