BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Litigation explosion

Expert replies
by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:37 pm
Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.
(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.
(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.
(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.
(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nithin82 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:50 pm
IMO
B .. because even though average payout has not increased substantially, the max payout would have occured within past decade
Join the discussion

by Mustang » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:02 pm
To me A seems very relevant because it talks about "unsuccessful suits" adding to the cost which is related to the argument about successful suits discussed in the sentence
Join the discussion

by nithin82 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:38 pm
yeah you are right
Join the discussion

by reachac » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:24 pm
IMO A.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:57 am
OA: A, rest OOS
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by domleon » Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:38 am
friends, can someone tell me why B is wrong?

cheers
Join the discussion

by gmattestprep » Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:41 am
B is wrong because it says "the average cost has remained the same". Which means that if there have been large awards in the past two years then there also have been some really small awards.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:42 am
B is out of scope when it states a typical case.
While the argument presents a general situation of litigation.

A is the choice because it cracks the conclusion" the statistics of successful suit" is same for past two years,
A: unsuccessful suit skyrocketed.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 3:04 am
I agree with you guys. I also think that the right answer is A
Join the discussion