BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Line

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by tohellandback » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:04 am
IMO E
A) not sufficient. there are many possibilities
B) Not possible-because many possibilities

combining 1 and 2
if both m and r are positive
m=6,r=18
but there is one more possibility. when m is negative and r is positive
m=-12,r =36
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:03 am
what is r?

Statement 1: The distance between r and 0 is 3 times the distance between m and 0

In absolute terms, this means: |r| = 3|m|, and from this you have the following possibilities:

i) r = 3m
ii) r = -3m

It is evident from here that even if we know m, we cannot solve for r. Insufficient.


Statement 2: 12 is halfway between m and r

If a number is halfway between two other numbers (say a and b), then essentially this number is also the average of a and b. So,

12 = (m + r)/2
24 = m + r

Once again, without sufficient knowledge of m, we cannot solve for r. Insufficient.

Both statements together:

if r = 3m, then 24 = 4m and m = 6, r = 18.
if r = -3m, then 24 = -2m and m = -12, r = 36.

Insufficient. Choose E.

-BM-
Join the discussion