BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Lily Bart

Expert replies
by komal » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:52 am
In 1905, The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was a reputable press in the early twentieth century.

(A) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was
(B) Lily Bart, published by Scribner's, and was
(C) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's, being
(D) Lily Bart, which was published by Scribner's, was
(E) Lily Bart, was published by Scribner's,

OA E Source kaplan 800
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by nox104 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:05 am
E

We need a comma after Lily Bart as it is modifying "The House of Mirth". Further, B / D are wrong because of was / which.
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:07 am
komal wrote:In 1905, The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was a reputable press in the early twentieth century.

(A) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was
(B) Lily Bart, published by Scribner's, and was
(C) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's, being
(D) Lily Bart, which was published by Scribner's, was
(E) Lily Bart, was published by Scribner's,

OA E Source kaplan 800
The House of Mirth was published by Scribner's is the message which needs to be conveyed.

Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart should modify The House of Mirth, and should be within commas.

a reputable press in the early twentieth century refers to Scribner's and should modify it. Most concise construction would be to write this clause after Scribner's with a comma in between.

Hence E.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by samarpan_bschool » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:10 am
It is a case of modifier issue here.


In 1905, The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was a reputable press in the early twentieth century.

(A) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was
(B) Lily Bart, published by Scribner's, and was
(C) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's, being
(D) Lily Bart, which was published by Scribner's, was
(E) Lily Bart, was published by Scribner's,

Here there are two modifiers -
- Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart which should modify 'The house of Mirth'
- a reputable press in the early twentieth century which should modify scribner's

Option A -> IT refer to 'The house of mirth' and hence wrong
Option B -> The subject of 'was' is 'The house of mirth' and hence wrong
Option C -> The usage of 'being' itself is awkward and 'being' refers to 'The house of mirth' !! WRONG
Option D -> same as option B

Option E -> clear - notice the pair of commas before and after this phrase - Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart . It clearly modifies 'The house of mirth'.
Join the discussion

by Fiver » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:35 am
Agree with nox104.
We need a comma after the modifier.

The primary thing to notice here is that the modifier 'a reputable press...' needs to be placed next to 'Scribner's', which appears to be the name of the press.

E is good.
Last edited by Fiver on Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by prinit » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:37 am
komal wrote:In 1905, The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton's novel about the blighted aspirations of Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was a reputable press in the early twentieth century.

(A) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's and it was
(B) Lily Bart, published by Scribner's, and was
(C) Lily Bart was published by Scribner's, being
(D) Lily Bart, which was published by Scribner's, was
(E) Lily Bart, was published by Scribner's,

OA E Source kaplan 800

My pick is E. One more comma splice question...
>>Correct usage of comma to establish the necessary relationship with antecedent.
E wins clearly.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1