BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Life Jackets

Expert replies
by sourabh33 » Thu May 12, 2011 8:01 am
During the past five years, more than five thousand Maltanians have drowned in boating accidents. Figures released by the country's Boating Association show that ninety percent of the victims were not wearing life jackets at the time of their accidents. This information indicates that by wearing life jackets, boaters can reduce their risk of drowning if they are involved in a boating accident.

Which of the following best supports the argument above?

1. Most of the drowning victims were not wearing lifejackets at the time of their accidents
2. More than ten percent of those involved in boating accidents were wearing life jackets at the time
3. Most boating accidents do not result in drowning
4. The boating association is not funded by a company that manufactures life jackets
5. Many of the drowning victims were knocked unconscious during their accidents
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Thu May 12, 2011 8:09 am
IMO 3.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by joshua868 » Thu May 12, 2011 9:41 am
Can you please explain?
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri May 13, 2011 9:27 am
HSPA wrote:IMO 3.
Dude how did u deduce 3 . i go for 1
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sourabh33 » Fri May 13, 2011 3:48 pm
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri May 13, 2011 4:43 pm
what a question man...so damm tricky!!!
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Fri May 13, 2011 4:46 pm
Reason : Out of those involved in accidents, 90% victims were not wearing LF and only 10% victims were wearing LF. so wearing LF reduces the chance of drowning.
example : 110 members , 100 victims, 90 not wearing LF and 10 wearing LF. 10 people saved their life by wearing LF.


There are better ways to eliminate other option, our goal is to mark correct option & move on

Reason why others are not correct
1- This we already know "Figures released by the country's Boating Association show that ninety percent of the victims were not wearing life jackets at the time of their accidents"

we need more info to support conclusion based on this premise

3- we are concerned about accidents that result in drowning so that importance of life jackets can be evaluated

4- dose not matter if company if funded or not
5- victims's unconsciousness does not supportm it is irrelevant
Last edited by vikram4689 on Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by Tani » Fri May 13, 2011 8:50 pm
If wearing lifejackets did not affect the probability of drowning, the percent of boaters who drown while wearing lifejackets should be equal to the percent in accidents who are wearing life jackets.

Conversely, the percent who drown while NOT wearing lifejackets should be equal to the percent in accidents who don't wear lifejackets.

We know the percent who drowned while wearing lifejackets was 10%. B, however, tells us that the percent in accidents who WERE wearing lifejackets is greater than 10%. Therefore the lifejackets are saving lives.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion