BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Letters

Expert replies
by vinay1983 » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:38 pm
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,
outnumbering
her letters to anyone else.

Correct option : Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

My query is how can the usage of "which " here be correct, since it should modify letters and not Dickinson!

Is this a rare property of which usage?
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by [email protected] » Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:51 am
Hi vinay1983,

The word "which" IS modifying "letters"; you have to read the whole phrase "letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson" to see it. Here, the noun is "letters", not "Dickinson"

This is not a common presentation of modification, but it is still correct.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by sana.noor » Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:51 am
"which" is used to refer a noun and what is the noun here? use "slash and burn" procedure
Emily Dickinson's letters (we arnt talking about emily neither dickinson but about letters)
to Susan Huntington Dickinson....which were written

letters are plural...were is used after "which" so automatically we know that this "were" isnt for dickinson but for letters. "which were" is modifying letters. when ever in doubt, look for the verb usd after "which"

we are actually talking about letters, so main subject is letters not dickinson

i hope this helps
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion

by ani781 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:06 am
Hi Sana ,
Can u please tell me what is a "slash and burn" procedure ?

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by sana.noor » Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:32 pm
slash and burn procedure is to remove all prepositional phrases and modifying phrases
in the above example i remove "tosusan huntington dickson
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written [spoiler]over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,[/spoiler] outnumber her letters to anyone else. now read this simple sentence and u will understand that why using "which were" and "outnumber" is correct.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion

by \'manpreet singh » Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:29 am
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

Remember we know that which modifies the noun before it.
Here "to Susan Dickinson" is a prepositional phrase and it cannot be modified by which, so the noun that "which" modifies is the " letters".So its Usage is fine.and also as Sana pointed out correctly you can check the verb after "which" in this case it is "were" .Thus we know that "which" is correctly modifying plural noun(letters) here.

---------------------------------------------------
"Good things come to those who wait... greater things come to those who get off their ass and do anything to make it happen."
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1