BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

let's discuss

Expert replies
by yangliu0401 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:40 pm
No. 1:
Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in public. Even though Dr. Smith is otherwise qualified, clearly she cannot be included on a panel that examines the danger of secondhand cigarette smoke. As an organizer of the panel, I want to ensure that the panel examines the issue in an unbiased manner before coming to any conclusion.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest basis for countering Dr. Ruiz' argument that Dr. Smith should not be included on the panel?

(A) A panel composed of qualified people with strong but conflicting views on a particular topic is more likely to reach an unbiased conclusion than a panel composed of people who have kept their views, if any, private.

(B) People who hold strong views on a particular topic tend to accept new evidence on that topic only if it supports their views.

(C) A panel that includes one qualified person with publicly known strong views on a particular topic is more likely to have lively discussions than a panel that includes only people with no well-defined views on that topic.

(D) People who have expressed strong views in public on a particular topic are better at raising funds to support their case than are people who have never expressed strong views in public.

(E) People who have well-defined strong views on a particular topic prior to joining a panel are often able to impose their views on panel members who are not committed at the outset to any conclusion.

The answer is A. Why not E?
I think E's more logical-- If one's opinion can influnce other members' decision, then the final result of the panel would not be objective.

***********************************************************
No. 2:
Professor: Members of most species are able to communicate with other members of the same species, but it is not true that all communication can be called "language." The human communication system unquestionably qualifies as language. In fact, using language is a trait without which we would not be human.

Student: I understand that communication by itself is not language, but how do you know that the highly evolved communication systems of songbirds, dolphins, honeybees, and apes, for example, are not languages?

The student has interpreted the professor's remarks to mean that

(A) different species can have similar defining traits

(B) every human trait except using language is shared by at least one other species

(C) not all languages are used to communicate

(D) using language is a trait humans do not share with any other species

(E) humans cannot communicate with members of other species

Really have no idea about the answer. E???or D??? :oops:
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by umaa » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:33 pm
1. E is wrong because in the argument nowhere it is mentioned that Dr. Smith has strong view.

So, E is not relevant to the argument.

2. I think A is correct. I don't find anything relevant to the students opposition. Please post the OA for this question.
Join the discussion

by kvivekj » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:39 pm
1. The answer is definitely A.
We are supposed to choose the best truth that counters Ruiz's argument.
Answer choice E clearly supports the argument. It supports the argument by saying that Smith has a predefined notion about smoking and she would probably convince all other panel members for her decision. So it supports.
Answer choice A says that Smith has a different view and a panel with members having different view will be successful in providing an unbiased decision. Hence, A.
2. I go for D.
Professor, in his lecture, is talking about the communication among members of the same species. He says Communication among Humans takes place with the help of language. We clearly understand that human languages cant be used for communicating with other species, meaning language is used only for communication among humans, we don’t share language communication with other species. If Dolphins and other evolved species can communicate effectively among themselves, why cant their communication termed as language? So, the student has interpreted that humans don’t share the trait of language communication with other species.
Join the discussion

by yangliu0401 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:26 am
kvivekj wrote:1. The answer is definitely A.
We are supposed to choose the best truth that counters Ruiz's argument.
Answer choice E clearly supports the argument. It supports the argument by saying that Smith has a predefined notion about smoking and she would probably convince all other panel members for her decision. So it supports.
Answer choice A says that Smith has a different view and a panel with members having different view will be successful in providing an unbiased decision. Hence, A.
2. I go for D.
Professor, in his lecture, is talking about the communication among members of the same species. He says Communication among Humans takes place with the help of language. We clearly understand that human languages cant be used for communicating with other species, meaning language is used only for communication among humans, we don’t share language communication with other species. If Dolphins and other evolved species can communicate effectively among themselves, why cant their communication termed as language? So, the student has interpreted that humans don’t share the trait of language communication with other species.
I think it's more clear now. Thx a lot :D
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Sun May 15, 2016 2:42 am
I still feel A should be the answer
Join the discussion