BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Les mass!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:45 am
A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars, but thousands or even millions of times less in its mass as the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.

(A) thousands or even millions of times less in its mass as
(B) it is thousands or even millions of times less massive as
(C) thousands or even millions of times less massive than
(D) yet it is thousands or even millions times less massive than
(E) yet it is thousands or even millions of times less in its mass than

I can have the right answer by applying the following reasoning:

Less X...than

=> We can rule out A and B.

But and yet are two coordinating conjunctions. They should not be used together, so I eliminate D and E.

Answer is C.

My question:

Can they, but and yet, be used together?

Experts, please help.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:44 am
I don't see how C can be right.
A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars, but thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.
The main clause of the question is:

A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars, but thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.

With conjunction "but", you are suppose to be connecting two clauses, and:
thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies
does not have a subject nor a verb.
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:09 am
@Uwhusky, I have my doubts too.

I guess I read somewhere that a construction with coordinating conjunction should have one of the following constructions.

Either ....comma + but + pronoun antecedant as follows:

A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars, but it is thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.

OR .... without a comma as follows:

A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars BUT thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.

Experts, please clarify.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:26 pm
I'll use a different example:
The dog is small but bigger than other cats.
Doesn't that sound more ambiguous than to say:
The dog is small but it is bigger than other cats.
Another example:
The boxer weighs in at 200 lbs but less weight than the champion.
Shouldn't there be at least a verb following but?
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:48 am
uwhusky wrote:I'll use a different example:
The dog is small but bigger than other cats.
Doesn't that sound more ambiguous than to say:
The dog is small but it is bigger than other cats.
Another example:
The boxer weighs in at 200 lbs but less weight than the champion.
Shouldn't there be at least a verb following but?
"the dog is small but its bigger than other cats", according to me is wordy. you jsut dont need "it
is" here and they still understand what it is here in the ST
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:16 am
You are correct in saying that whenever comma + but is used, clause should follow.

My guess is that this question has a typographical error. There should not be any "Comma" before "but".

The sentence structure produces a list as follows:

A middleweight black hole weighs in at roughly 500 solar masses, hundreds of times more massive than the lightweight black holes produced by the collapse of individual stars, but thousands or even millions of times less massive than the heavyweight giants that lurk in the centers of galaxies.

XYZ blackhole weighs 123, comparison 1 but comparison 2.

If this error is corrected, then this question tests 2 things:
1: Use of Idiom - Less..Than
2: Redundant use of yet with but - Both these words present a contrast and hence using both of them in the same sentence produces a redundant expression.
Join the discussion

by gmattaker20 » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:00 pm
Other subtle grammatical error:

(C) thousands or even millions of times less massive than
(D) yet it is thousands or even millions (of missing) times less massive than
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1