BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Leibniz vs Newton...!!!

Expert replies
by killer1387 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:04 am
Historian: Leibniz, the seventeenth-century philosopher, published his version of calculus before Newton did. But then Newton revealed his private notebooks, which showed he had been using these ideas for at least a decade before Leibniz's publication. Newton also claimed that he had disclosed these ideas to Leibniz in a letter shortly before Leibniz's publication. Yet close examination of the letter shows that Newton's few cryptic remarks did not reveal anything important about calculus. Thus, Leibniz and Newton each independently discovered calculus.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the historian's argument?

A. Leibniz did not tell anyone about calculus prior to publishing his version of it.
B. No third person independently discovered calculus prior to Newton and Leibniz.
C. Newton believed that Leibniz was able to learn something important about calculus from his letter to him.
D. Neither Newton nor Leibniz knew that the other had developed a version of calculus prior to Leibniz's publication.
E. Neither Newton nor Leibniz learned crucial details about calculus from some third source.

Guys give it a try. OA E to follow post some discussions.
Last edited by killer1387 on Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by avik.ch » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:52 am
IMO : E

But B was a good trap !!
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:59 am
avik.ch wrote:IMO : E

But B was a good trap !!
Could you please elaborate the logic behind your pick.

thnx
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:05 am
Leibniz, the seventeenth-century philosopher, published his version of calculus before Newton did. But then Newton revealed his private notebooks, which showed he had been using these ideas for at least a decade before Leibniz's publication. Newton also claimed that he had disclosed these ideas to Leibniz in a letter shortly before Leibniz's publication. - facts
Yet close examination of the letter shows that Newton's few cryptic remarks did not reveal anything important about calculus. - premise
Thus, Leibniz and Newton each independently discovered calculus. - conclusion

L and N both independently discovered calculus ----> as N's letter did not reveal anything to L about calculus.

Now here there is a change in scope -

discovering independently --- > letter not revealing anything.

Anything that will connect this two or will negate anything that will weaken this statement by bringing this scope change.

E does that : by negating the weaken scenario that stands for the scope change.

A - irrelevant
B - The stimulus talks about only N and L, so X,Y,,....are not in the scope of the argument.

I think all other answer choices are tangent to the correct one.


Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:33 am
D/E, E is better!
Join the discussion