Legislation in the Canadian province

abcgmat wrote:Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
A. that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
B. that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
C. to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
D. to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
E. to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills.

[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
I have a confusion between A and C
I would like to know If
1. same in - is an Incorrect IDIOM or is it used in a wrong way here
2. and why C is wrong is inferior to A?

abcgmat wrote:Hi

I think : require can be used with 'that' or with 'to'
E.g. I require some money to lend my brother

abcgmat wrote:Hi

I think : require can be used with 'that' or with 'to'
E.g. I require some money to lend my brother

Can some one help regarding usage of

same for jobs Vs same in jobs in Option A and C.

abcgmat wrote:2. Bossy verb + object + to + command subjunctive ---> I require him to be here.

Is the above statement a rule or is it something you have observed, If its a rule could you tell the source

1. Bossy verb(require) + that + subject + command subjunctive --> i require that he be here.

Now converting the subject of the noun clause into the object of the verb - "require"


2. Bossy verb + object + to + command subjunctive ---> I require him to be here.

PGMAT wrote:
In C, whats the object / subject? Can you explain how 2. fits here?