BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

LCM // GCD inconsistency

Expert replies
by Stockmoose16 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:56 pm
If LCM * GCD = product, why is the following not working out?

Using the numbers 15, 27, 50, the LCM is 1350. The GCD, on the other hand, is 1. If you multiply the GCD*LCM, you get 1350. However, the product of the 3 numbers (15, 27, and 50) is 2050. Why is there a discrepancy between the formula and the aforementioned calculation?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by gmat009 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm
the product of two numbers is equal to the product of LCM and GCD of the two numbers.

I think this formula is valid for two numbers only not more than two
Join the discussion