BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

laws of motion

Expert replies
by killerdrummer » Mon May 13, 2013 8:58 am
Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hemant_rajput » Tue May 14, 2013 11:10 pm
killerdrummer wrote:Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion

IMO B. Condition and its converse , both terms are bind together as one, like bread and butter.

what actually is the source of this sentence? I've my doubts about the structure of the sentence.
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by vivekchandrams » Wed May 15, 2013 4:57 am
Hey hemant_rajput,

I'm totally not satisfied with my answer, and I go with A. The reason why I chose it is that when there are 2 objects joined by an 'and' they tend to become plural. For eg., A and B are good friends. Here it preceeds the 2 objects in consideration - a condition, it's converse.

Please correct me if I am wrong
Join the discussion

by hutch27 » Wed May 15, 2013 1:09 pm
killerdrummer wrote:Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion
noooo u cant have those original sentences cuz it doesnt make sense... wrong modifier. After a prepositional phrase u cant have there are. it just doesnt work.

this would probably be better from a grammatical standpoint at conveying the intended meaning

There is a condition and its converse, regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion, in the laws of motion
Join the discussion

by killerdrummer » Thu May 16, 2013 9:38 pm
Well OA was A..

Frankly,I don't remember the source. I have been trying to find out the same but unable to... :(
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1