BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Law

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 1 times
by sogmat » Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:25 pm
The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Law

by iamcste » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:29 pm
sogmat wrote:The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
well, errors are

1. minority hiring and eventually promoting= X and Y

X must be logically and grammatically parallel, which is certainly not the case. Hiring is a noun while promoting is just a participle.

Eliminate A and B

2. E is passive and wordy

Left with C and D
While I couldnt really find any major error I feel like going with C

In C, quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion..and is correctly used to join 2 statement related to a common subject
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:11 pm
Choice D uses the comma in an inapporpriate way.

Dont split a compound predicate i.e in the sentence above what an offer of a position did and did not do are closely related ideas.

Dont use a comma in this situation. Never use a comma to split a compound subject or a compound predicate

Hence C wins over D.

Hope I am not off here...

Regards,
CR
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:12 pm
@iamcste
well, errors are

1. minority hiring and eventually promoting= X and Y

X must be logically and grammatically parallel, which is certainly not the case. Hiring is a noun while promoting is just a participle.

Eliminate A and B

2. E is passive and wordy
Between C and D

If you observe carefully...

Here we are talking about the "offer" of the firm...

In D, the clause "not reflecting..." modifies the word "quota".. We want something that modifies "offer" ...

C exactly does that by using proper conjunction.

thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:14 pm
Well put, Raunek.

Regards,
CR
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:04 pm
raunekk wrote:
In D, the clause "not reflecting..." modifies the word "quota".. We want something that modifies "offer" ...

C exactly does that by using proper conjunction.

thanks.
while I may be incorrect, I am not very sure that "not reflecting" modifies quota, I feel like its participal modifying subject of previous clause and not quota
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1