BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Last Friday

Expert replies
by ektamatta » Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:06 pm
4. Last Friday a certain shop sold 43 of the sweaters in its inventory. Each sweater sold for $20. What was the total revenue last Friday from the sale of these sweaters?
(1) When the shop opened last Friday, there were 160 sweaters in its inventory.
(2) All but 40 sweaters in the shop’s inventory were sold last Friday.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by parallel_chase » Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:07 pm
I think the answer is C.

Statement I.

Total number of sweaters in the inventory is 160. Out of this 43 + x number of sweaters are sold. We dont know the value of x.

Insufficient.

Statement II.

total inventory - (x+43)= 40
We dont know the total number of sweaters in the inventory.
Insufficient.


Combining statement I & II.

total =160
sold x+43
remaining =40

160-(43+x)=40

we can solve for the value of x, can easily find out the total revenue i.e. (x+43)*20

Hence C. Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

OA

by ektamatta » Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:21 pm
no oa is not c
Join the discussion

Re: OA

by parallel_chase » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:01 am
ektamatta wrote:no oa is not c
Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by agent47 » Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:46 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

Re: Last Friday

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:27 am
ektamatta wrote:4. Last Friday a certain shop sold 43 of the sweaters in its inventory. Each sweater sold for $20. What was the total revenue last Friday from the sale of these sweaters?
(1) When the shop opened last Friday, there were 160 sweaters in its inventory.
(2) All but 40 sweaters in the shop’s inventory were sold last Friday.
Ummm.. I'm very confused by this question.

Last Friday a shop sold 43 sweaters. Each sweater sold for $20. Why isn't the revenue last Friday from these sweaters 43 * $20 = $860?

Based on the question as written, you can answer the question from information in the question stem - and there's no answer for that on the GMAT (i.e. it's an impossible question).

Maybe I'm misinterpreting the question, feel free to enlighten me!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:39 am
Is it possible to get the answer in the question in DS?
I was also wondering, is it possible to find an answer with 1) only and another solution with 2) only ? Or there is only one solution to the question?
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:05 am
I thought about the same thing as stuart did. If we can get the answer from the question stem itself, I dont think this can even be a DS question.

But I still took it as a legitimate question and went by the logic that we need to calculate the total revenue i.e. 43+x sweaters were sold last friday.

Hence we need both the statements. Let me know your thoughts.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:04 am
pepeprepa wrote:Is it possible to get the answer in the question in DS?
I was also wondering, is it possible to find an answer with 1) only and another solution with 2) only ? Or there is only one solution to the question?
Good questions- on the real GMAT, DS questions will always follow these rules:

-it will never be possible to answer the question without using additional information;

-the two statements will never contradict each other.

Some questions designed by test prep companies do not, however, obey these rules- which usually doesn't inspire me with much confidence in the value of these questions.

So, you'll *never* see GMAT questions like the following:

If x is an integer, and x > 10, is x odd?
1) x is prime
2) x + 2 is even

The two statements contradict each other (if x > 10, the first statement ensures x is odd, while the second ensures that x is even)- they can't both be true. Illegal on the GMAT.

If x is an integer, and 2 < x < 4, what is the value of x?
1) x^2 = 9
2) |x-3| = 0

You know from the stem that x = 3; you don't need any of the statements. Again, illegal on the GMAT.

This means that on real GMAT DS questions, if you think you can answer the question without additional information, you've misunderstood the question. If the two statements appear to give contradictory information, you've misunderstood one of the statements. You can't apply these tests on questions from some test prep companies, however- not all questions are well-designed.

Finally, I'm just as mystified as Stuart about the question in the original post - why do we need the statements at all? My guess is that the question should read: "A shop sold 3/4 of the sweaters in its inventory...", which is then an appropriate DS question.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion