BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

large steel plants

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times
by kaulnikhil » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:12 am
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.
(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain
(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain
(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

[spoiler]Cant E be parallel..small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (HAVE) remained[/spoiler]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 137 times

by thephoenix » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:37 am
in comparison s/c the sub and verb being compared has to be llel and the comparison has to be in like terms
all this leads to D
in E remained is not llel to take
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:04 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by subgeeth » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:44 am
D

in E remained is not llel to put
Remain is llel to put

to put and remain
to put and remained
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:13 pm
Location: Greater NYC
Thanked: 14 times

by prinit » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:20 am
kaulnikhil wrote:In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.
(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain
(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain
(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

[spoiler]Cant E be parallel..small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (HAVE) remained[/spoiler]
My pick is D. Immediately after reading the sentence, I narrowed down my choice to D and E. D is clear and parallelism. take Vs remain. So D wins
I'm here to BTG :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times

by sumanr84 » Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:11 am
+1 for D. Narrowing down to D & E is quite simple.

Thereafter, take and remain are ||el in D.
I am on a break !!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times

by kaulnikhil » Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:07 pm
prinit wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.
(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain
(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain
(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

[spoiler]Cant E be parallel..small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (HAVE) remained[/spoiler]
My pick is D. Immediately after reading the sentence, I narrowed down my choice to D and E. D is clear and parallelism. take Vs remain. So D wins
Thequestion is from OG . and parallelism is between to put and remain....parallelism with take doesnt make sense as the remain describes small mills...However your answer is correct but the logic is wrong..Hence would like to know why cant we use have(Understood) remained to describe small mills....In this way have been able and have remained will be parallel
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:18 am
kaulnikhil wrote:
prinit wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.
(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain
(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining
(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain
(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

[spoiler]Cant E be parallel..small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (HAVE) remained[/spoiler]
My pick is D. Immediately after reading the sentence, I narrowed down my choice to D and E. D is clear and parallelism. take Vs remain. So D wins
Thequestion is from OG . and parallelism is between to put and remain....parallelism with take doesnt make sense as the remain describes small mills...However your answer is correct but the logic is wrong..Hence would like to know why cant we use have(Understood) remained to describe small mills....In this way have been able and have remained will be parallel
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1