BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Lake Konfa

Expert replies
by urshohini » Fri Nov 25, 2011 5:28 am
Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted.
Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner.
Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.
However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.
Therefore, provided this technology is effective, the fears are groundless.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. The pipeline's construction will disturb sediments at the bottom of the lake, dispersing into the water toxic pollutants that have settled there.
B. Changes in land use and drainage patterns around the lake mean that the lake's waters are increasingly likely to be affected by agricultural runoff.
C. The leak-preventing technology has been in use for several years without any pipeline in which it is installed developing serious leaks.
D. A major leak of oil from the pipeline would harm not only the lake's fish but also populations of other aquatic animals and plants.
E. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, non-native species of fish have been introduced into the lake and now make up a considerable proportion of its overall fish population

OA is
A
Source: GMATPrep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by urshohini » Fri Nov 25, 2011 5:29 am
Experts, pl explain the above.
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Fri Nov 25, 2011 5:53 am
Yes the answer should be A because though technology is effective and leakage will not happen but the pollutants that have settled will definitely be disturbed and gain the lake will get polluted.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:58 am
I wish to comment on this problem
B is wrong because of "likely". B is wrong because the weakening action has not happened actually. The weakening action must happen actually though it is only to increase the doubt in an assumption and so in the conclution

Many question in testpre in which correct answer is showned that the weakening action possiblly happen. This is wrong. sorry, I do not remember. next time, I meet a question with this problem I will turn to this post again.
Join the discussion

by The Lost Spaniard » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:34 pm
Interesting. It took me a while to find this Question with this set of Answers. There is another question out there with the same question but different answers.

I agree, A. Even though the technology is effective and the fears are groundless (according to the author) the fact that the process of constructing the pipeline will disperse the toxic pollutants in the settlement is cause for fear and will be devastating to the ecosystem.
Join the discussion

by Shivikaa » Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:25 am
Hi,
Can someone explain me why did we remove C option?
Thanks in Advance.
Join the discussion

by ErikaPrepScholar » Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:42 pm
Another issue with B that hasn't been addressed: we do not know that the construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom will affect land use and drainage patterns around the lake. 1) Pipeline is at the bottom of the lake, not around the lake. 2) There is no clear connection between the pipeline and land use or drainage. So B is irrelevant to the argument at hand.

As for C, this answer choice talks about the leak-preventing technology that has been in use recently. We do not know that it is the technology in the passage. Furthermore, the passage itself qualifies the conclusion with "provided this technology is effective". So the passage does not claim that the fears are groundless even if the pipes leak. It claims that if the technology successfully prevents the pipes from leaking, then the fears are groundless. The scenario of what happens if the pipes DO leak isn't addressed by the passage. So C is also irrelevant to the argument at hand.

Happy to answer additional questions about these answer choices or the others.
Image

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog
Join the discussion

Ttt

by Akrita@Jamboree » Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:58 am
Let us identify the premises and the conclusion in this argument.

Premise 1: There are fears that the construction of the pipeline across Lake Konfa's bottom would revive the pollution levels in the lake, resulting in a decline in the fish population
Premise 2: Technology for preventing leaks is being installed

Conclusion: Provided that the technology for preventing leaks is effective, the construction of the pipeline would not result in an increased pollution level and decreased fish population

In CR questions, it always helps to spend a bit of time to think about the author's assumption. The best way to visualize assumptions is to think of them as the things/missing variables which the author assumes to be true in his own mind when going from the premise to the conclusion.

In this case, a crucial assumption made by the author is that "Leakage from the pipeline is the ONLY way via which the pollution levels in the lake would increase and the fish population will decline". But what if there are other ways in which the pipeline construction can increase pollution levels and destroy the fish population? If there are other ways aside from a pipeline leakage that could be detrimental to the fish population, then the future technology would be rendered useless. Since we have to weaken the argument, we are looking for such an answer.

Option A - Correct : This option close matches our lines of pre-thinking above and provides a way aside from pipeline leakage via which the pollution levels can increase (and hence the fish population can decrease). This is a very strong contender.
Option B - Incorrect : Irrelevant - This option doesn't address the pipeline nor the technology being put in place
Option C - Incorrect : This is the exact opposite to what we are looking for since this option says that the technology will be useful in preventing leaks
Option D - Incorrect : Irrelevant - This is a good bit of info to know regarding the seriousness of the issue at hand, but it doesn't answer our question of whether the pollution levels would increase as a result of the pipeline construction
Option B - Incorrect : Irrelevant and Out of Scope

Hence, Option A is our best answer to weaken the above argument.

Please let me know in case anything doesn't make sense.
Join the discussion