BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Knewton Support 4

Expert replies
by itsmebharat » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:39 am
European green crabs are an invasive species which have recently colonized the Northwest coast of North America, among other places. They disrupt ecosystems and prey heavily on native shellfish. However, in Europe, the population of green crabs is kept relatively low by a parasitic barnacle called Sacculina carcini. This barnacle is hardy and could likely be introduced to areas where the European green crab threatens to ruin established ecosystems.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument that it would NOT be advisable to attempt to eliminate European green crabs from the Northwest coast of North America by introducing to the area the parasitic barnacle discussed above?

(A) In their native habitat, the parasites often threaten the elimination of local green crab populations.
(B) European green crabs are also occasionally preyed upon by fishes, gulls and other species of crab in their native ecosystems.
(C) Though the parasite may survive in North American waters, no large-scale facility for breeding and harvesting the parasites exists as of yet.
(D) Many other invasive species on the Northwest coast of North America are not suitable hosts for this parasite.
(E) Though the barnacle cannot reproduce inside of native shore crabs, it can still infect and kill native shore crabs.


OA E
I am not an Expert, please feel free to suggest if there is an error.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:55 am
IMO E
a) barnacle won't be in its natural habitat in North America
b) irrelevant
c) We want parasites to remove European green cabs and not to breed
d) we are concerned about European green crabs only.
e) correct. They can kill native crabs.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:19 am
E, it will pose problems for native crabs.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by GMATToppers » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:28 am
This is a strengthen the argument question the only difference is that the conclusion to be strengthened is in the Q stem: therefore it would not be advisable to attempt to eliminate European green crabs from the Northwest coast of North America by introducing to the area the parasitic barnacle discussed above
This can be done is there ways
1.Supply the supporter assumption
2.provide a situational support
3.provide a principle theory support
So focus only on the conclusion ie it is not good to introduce these parasites in North America because of some problem they may cause in North America due to their nature to eliminate the other species.so the two key elements are North America getting affected and parasite affecting it
A.Native habitat of the parasite is irrelevant for this as we are looking at Nrth Ame in specific
B.The parasite is not talked about here
C.The problem is about the effect on North Ame
D.Other Invasive parasite is not host it doesn't do any negative effect on North Ame
E.This the right ans since the parasite will cause a negative effect on the North Ame coast
You are providing a situational support
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:00 am
really difficult to interpret the answer choices as what are they actually doing to the Conclusion of the argument.
Join the discussion