BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

knewton cr test

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:58 pm
Because of a rare type of fungus that killed off many cacao trees in Brazil, there was an unusually meager harvest of cacao beans this year. The wholesale price of cocoa solids and cocoa butter has increased significantly and is unlikely to fall in the foreseeable future. As a result, the retail price of chocolate is certain to increase within six months.

The answer to which of the following questions would provide information relevant to evaluating the argument above?

Has the price of cocoa solids and cocoa butter remained steady during other periods of poor harvest?

Are consumers willing to spend more for chocolate?

Have the prices of other ingredients in chocolate decreased recently?

What percentage of cacao trees in Brazil were affected by the fungus?

Can the fungus be eliminated within the next six months?
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:06 am
IMO C.

But I would ward off this question as poorly written. It doesnt mention that COCOA is used in making Chocolate. I dont think it is commonsense.

Assuming that COCOA is used in chocolate making,
If COCOA price has increased, we will still need to check if the prices have other ingredients of chocolate have gone down.

hence pick C.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by inactived » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:40 am
I think the answer is E since if the fungus can be eliminated in the near future (6 months) -> increase the CACAO's productivity -> reduce the cocoa's price.

But I do agree with kvcpk that the stimulus doesn't say anything about relationship between CACAO - COCOA - Chocolate
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:19 am
kvcpk wrote:IMO C.

But I would ward off this question as poorly written. It doesnt mention that COCOA is used in making Chocolate. I dont think it is commonsense.

Assuming that COCOA is used in chocolate making,
If COCOA price has increased, we will still need to check if the prices have other ingredients of chocolate have gone down.

hence pick C.
Praveen,

Same here.. I am not able to see y Knewton CR is really not upto the mark...

This is one example...I am facing tough times here man...
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Sep 11, 2010 12:13 am
inactived wrote:I think the answer is E since if the fungus can be eliminated in the near future (6 months) -> increase the CACAO's productivity -> reduce the cocoa's price.

But I do agree with kvcpk that the stimulus doesn't say anything about relationship between CACAO - COCOA - Chocolate
i dont think the answer is E since well the fungus happened, thus it destroyed the tree, much or a little ... in 6 months you know...
this cant be for me
i chose C
whats the answer
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:07 am
IMO C, but as Praveen and Govi mentioned this is not very good written question. We need an extra assumption to know who makes chocolate.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion