amar66 wrote:And btw, B supports the argument rather than criticizing it. It tells that the revenue will be compensated so it strengthen the argument. In this case profit will rise.
On the other hand by assuming C, we can conclude that the profit will fall.

czarczar wrote:Currently, the Bridgetown Badgers' Stadium has only expensive theater-style seating. Most Badgers fans would prefer to pay for less expensive bench seats due to the fact that they already stand for most of the game to see as much as possible. However, patrons in other stadiums' bench seating sections often leave their seats, because the bench seats are uncomfortable, and many of those trips are used to buy food or souvenirs from stadium concession stands. Thus, if the Bridgetown Badgers' Stadium replaced some of its theater-style seating with bench seating, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that


(A) some fans come to the Bridgetown Badgers' Stadium to support their team by waving signs, and so might choose bench seating so that they can stand on their seats

(B) the revenue from snacks ordered by fans in bench seating compensates for any revenue lost from patrons buying tickets for less expensive seats

(C) patrons of the Bridgetown Badgers' Stadium who would choose bench seating would be an exception to the generalization about patrons leaving their seats more often

(D) a stadium's patrons who spend less time seated typically purchase less expensive snacks than those who spend more time in their seats

(E) if there were enough bench seating to accommodate all the Bridgetown Badgers fans interested in such seating, many fans would not be able to see the game

OA:C

I have a specific questions: What is the problem with option :B ?