Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

knewton cr question

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri May 31, 2013 10:32 pm
https://www.gmatmania.com/Gmattopic_Deta ... topicid=10


kewton-cr

Automobile Insurance Company Y is considering issuing a new family-friendly policy to parents with children under the age of 20. This policy would cover any damage to a vehicle incurred by both the parent and his or her children. Premiums for the policy must be low enough to attract customers. Therefore, Company Y is concerned that the income from the policies would not be sufficient to pay for the claims that would be made.

Which of the following strategies would be most likely to minimize Automobile Insurance Company Y's losses on the policies?

· Attracting parents with younger children who are unlikely to cause vehicular damage until they are of driving age.

· Turning down drivers who have received greater than the average number of moving or non-moving violations.

· Including more flexible add-on options than are included in other policies of lower cost.

· Insuring only those drivers who were rejected by other companies for similar policies.

· Insuring only those drivers who are wealthy enough to pay for the damages.
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by krishnapavan » Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:33 am
I think its A
Join the discussion

by fulltapori » Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:29 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by faraz_jeddah » Mon Jun 03, 2013 2:56 am
I would have to bring it down to A or C

I will go for A.

What is OA?
Join the discussion

by jainpiyushjain » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:32 am
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:43 pm
though they are similar but not the same in og its health insurance and in this it is vehicle insurance which is not related with the age of the insured but the driving skill of the driver. hence insurance should be given to those drivers those have less violations than the average violation of the drivers.hence they would have less claims and the cost of premium can be reduced.

i will go with B
in A younger children drive vehicle and damages also though they are not eligible to drive then in india and during claims they produce license of elders.

sorry i dont have OA
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion