BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

knewton cr hw 17

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:55 pm
The International Union for Conservation of Nature has released a report stating that almost one quarter of all known mammal species on Earth are in danger of extinction. Therefore, there is a dire need to redirect public funding toward habitat conservation, which is cited as the most pressing issue for the endangered species.

The argument above relies on which of the following methods of reasoning?

A
Citing an authority
B
Providing an analogy
C
Noting ulterior motives
D
Pointing out unconsidered consequences
E
Demonstrating a logical inconsistency
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:24 am
IMO [spoiler]A

The premises do not have an analogy (discard B), no intentionally hidden motives(discard C), No consequences mentioned (discard D). Not sure about E.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by pesfunk » Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:32 am
IMO A

"there is a dire need to redirect public funding" == >> Citing an authority
Join the discussion

by psychomath » Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:51 am
I will go with A too...Found this Q little tough...was more like an RC Q
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:39 am
oa is A
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion