BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

knewton cr 3

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:58 am
Competitive runners who run barefoot have been shown to have greater stamina during races than other racers. Therefore, training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runners' chances of winning any race.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens this arguments?

A Countries in which runners run barefoot often send athletes to the Olympics and to worldwide marathons.

B Having greater stamina does not always improve runners' chances of winning races.
C Many competitive runners train for years to increase their stamina before entering any competitions.
D Competitive runners with greater stamina are more likely to win races that are 1500 meters or longer.
E The vast majority of competitive runners in training do not train barefoot.
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:32 am
IMO B
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:56 am
Thanked: 4 times

by abhigang » Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:33 am
The assumption made here is greater stamina --> improved chances of winning any race.

I was thinking about B and D. But ultimately eliminated B because it mentions only runners whereas the argument talks about competitive runners only.

Also to mention about D, it talks about competive runners have their chances improved only on races that are 1500 or more whereas the argument talks about improving chances on any types of race.

IMO D.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:02 am
One more for B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:24 am
I'd go for B.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times

by adi_800 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:24 am
B+
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 am
Only B makes sense here
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 29 times
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:19 am
B WOULD MAKE ME HAPPY
@Deb
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:00 pm
Everybody is going for B.

Bur can somebody explain how B is weakening the argument :

Conclusion : training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runners’ chances of winning any race.

B : Having greater stamina does not always improve runners’ chances of winning races.

So, B is saying that It may or may not be useful. [ Bis not saying that it is not useful at all ]
Cocnlusion is also saying that chamces will increase. Conclusion is noy using the word : definetely

Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 29 times
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:29 pm
paes wrote:Everybody is going for B.

Bur can somebody explain how B is weakening the argument :

Conclusion : training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runners’ chances of winning any race.

B : Having greater stamina does not always improve runners’ chances of winning races.

So, B is saying that It may or may not be useful. [ Bis not saying that it is not useful at all ]
Cocnlusion is also saying that chamces will increase. Conclusion is noy using the word : definetely

Concusion "training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runners' chances of winning any race" . This is based on the premise - runners who run barefoot have been shown to have greater stamina during races than other racers... So it is making an assumption that greater stamina causes as increase in the likelihood of runners to win in competitions .... So you need to introduce evidence which proves that stamina is not the only criteria that is responsible for increasing this likelihood which is what B says
"having greater stamina does not always improve runners’ chances of winning races. "
@Deb
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:19 pm
Deb@
thanks, but still my point is same:

I am saying that : conclusion is also talking only about CHANCES [ probability ]


B is : Having greater stamina does not always improve runner's chances of winning races. -> means 2 things can happen

Suppose there are 100 runners with greater stamina. Now 2 things can happen :

(1) For some cases [ 40 runners ] : It improves runner's chances of winning race
(2) For other Cases [ 60 runners] : It doesn't improve runner's chances of winning race

Ok now : based on 1 and 2, I can say that :

training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runner's chances[PROBABILITY] of winning any race

I am not seeing anything wrong here.

If I(conclusion) say that :
the person training in bare feet will win the race. -> then I agree that B will weaken the conclusion
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:45 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:Competitive runners who run barefoot have been shown to have greater stamina during races than other racers. Therefore, training in bare feet is a useful method to improve competitive runners' chances of winning any race.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens this arguments?

A Countries in which runners run barefoot often send athletes to the Olympics and to worldwide marathons.

B Having greater stamina does not always improve runners' chances of winning races.
C Many competitive runners train for years to increase their stamina before entering any competitions.
D Competitive runners with greater stamina are more likely to win races that are 1500 meters or longer.
E The vast majority of competitive runners in training do not train barefoot.
i am toward to B and E but i really dont like B much because of "does not always improve runners' chances of winning races" it used in the argument... "does not always" doesnt mean that it would not helpful in gettin a chance to win
thus for me, E is the answer
A, C and D seems to strengthen the conclusion
E it is
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:05 pm
oa is B
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1