BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kernland -GMATPREP. Experts pls help

Expert replies
by zaarathelab » Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:08 am
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the byproducts of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in
Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their
land and into the cities.

Pls support your choice with explanations
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ranjeet75 » Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:14 am
IMO E

The argument says about the urban employment and the govt wants to reduce urban employment by imposing high tariff on export of cashew nuts but the high tariff on exports is disadvantageous for farmers and they are moving to cities and therefore the urban employment will be adversely affected hence E is correct answer
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:50 am
Oh my god.. what a toughie.. I would have chosen 'C' in exam. Only a careful eye can bring out E.

A double negitive it is.. present employment problem gets fixed with the uplift of the high tarrif.

(Farmers)People who are facing loss in agriculture will stop coming to town. Thus less unemployment rate
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by mehrasa » Fri Nov 25, 2011 5:25 am
zaarathelab wrote:Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the byproducts of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in
Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their
land and into the cities.

Pls support your choice with explanations


wooooooooow, I also made a mistake and chose C.. bcuz I spot the conclusion wrongly
actually the conclusion is that 'Kernland gov. imposes high tariff on unprocessed kernel in order to protect domestic plants and improve urban employment while, according to the stem, the profit of farmers will decrease by this new policy....
for weakening we need to show gov. can not really reach its goal since (as choice E says) the farmers have to move into cities and population of unemployed ppl increase...
Join the discussion

by mankey » Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:35 am
IMO: E. What is the OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:14 am
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:08 pm
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion