BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Katharine Graham!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:34 pm
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise

(B) It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and under her command it had won high praise

(C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command
(D) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command
(E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command


How I analyzed:

See the non-underlined portion of the sentence.
for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

Now, join with this the options CDE.

Under her command for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

=> the bold face changes the intended meaning of the sentence.

What is the actual deal with B?

Would any one explain in detail?

How many errors can be found in the option B?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by tomada » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:38 pm
I picked 'E', but what's the OA?
Join the discussion

by nibake » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:17 pm
A) Must be the correct answer - "it was...that it moved" is parallel to "it was...that the paper won" These constructions do seem a bit wordy, but there is no acceptable alternative given.
B) "Katharine Graham's becoming" is awkward. Hard to put the finger on everything here, but the past perfect "had won high praise" seems incorrect. Seems like the two Independent Clauses are unparallel as well.
C) Pronoun error - "that" does not have a clear antecedent
D) Sentence fragment - "winning" is a participal here and the subject of the sentence, "The Washington Post" has no finite verb
E) Possessives cannot be antecedent because they are not nouns - hence "her" cannot refer to Katharine Graham in E
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:30 pm
Yeah, 'E' is wrong, not sure what I was thinking. I change my answer to 'C'.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:27 pm
Pick A.

Since and is a parallel connector, notice the parallelism in A.

It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, AND it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

B uses past perfect incorrectly. simple past for "it was only after" and past perfect for "it had won high praise", which comes later chronologically than when Katharine Graham became publisher.

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:47 pm
OA pl.....
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:49 am
hardik.jadeja wrote:Pick A.

Since and is a parallel connector, notice the parallelism in A.

It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, AND it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

B uses past perfect incorrectly. simple past for "it was only after" and past perfect for "it had won high praise", which comes later chronologically than when Katharine Graham became publisher.

Hope that helps..
Before posting the question, I have read this idea from Stacy's post. I could not figure it out. Do you have any better idea regarding the option B?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:17 am
gmat_perfect wrote: Before posting the question, I have read this idea from Stacy's post. I could not figure it out. Do you have any better idea regarding the option B?

Thanks.
Past perfect tense is used to indicate that one action occurred before another action in the past. So basically past perfect tense indicates the first of the two actions.

Chronologically, the first event to occur is Katharine Graham becoming publisher of The Washington Post and then the paper won high praises. The paper won high praises because of Katharine's hard work that she put in after becoming the publisher.

We can't use simple past tense for the first event and the past perfect tense for the second event as done in B. The order should be past perfect tense for the first event and simple past tense for the second event.

Apart from Tense issue, B doesnt maintain the parallelism as option A does. Plus, "Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Washington Post" is an awkward construction. "Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post" is better.

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:28 am
My OA is A.
The reasons:
1) It maintains parallelism
2) pronouns 'it' and 'her' have proper antecedents
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1