BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kapptest- Expert help

Expert replies
by bryan88 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:26 am
The mayor of Island City has proposed that the toll on all bridges leading into the city be doubled after the first of next year. The mayor claims that the increased fee will cause large numbers of motorists to choose alternate forms of transportation into the city. According to the mayor, this shift will benefit the environment because of lower automobile emissions, will decrease traffic congestion in the city center, and will increase revenues for the city's light rail system.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the argument put forth by the mayor EXCEPT:

a) In order to avoid the new toll, many motorists will begin using car ferries to the city. The ferries are known to produce large amounts of toxic emissions.
b)In a recent survey, 98% of automobile commuters to the city claim that the increase in tolls will not cause them to stop driving to the city every day.
c)In addition to the increased tolls, the city council intends to lower the charge for the city's light rail system.
D)Island City has planned a large number of street renovation projects to begin in the city center at the same time as the increased bridge tolls.
e) The increased toll will result in an increase of approximately $1,500 per year for each motorist that drives into the city five times a week.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by saviogmat » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 pm
bryan88 wrote:The mayor of Island City has proposed that the toll on all bridges leading into the city be doubled after the first of next year. The mayor claims that the increased fee will cause large numbers of motorists to choose alternate forms of transportation into the city. According to the mayor, this shift will benefit the environment because of lower automobile emissions, will decrease traffic congestion in the city center, and will increase revenues for the city's light rail system.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the argument put forth by the mayor EXCEPT:

a) In order to avoid the new toll, many motorists will begin using car ferries to the city. The ferries are known to produce large amounts of toxic emissions.
b)In a recent survey, 98% of automobile commuters to the city claim that the increase in tolls will not cause them to stop driving to the city every day.
c)In addition to the increased tolls, the city council intends to lower the charge for the city's light rail system.
D)Island City has planned a large number of street renovation projects to begin in the city center at the same time as the increased bridge tolls.
e) The increased toll will result in an increase of approximately $1,500 per year for each motorist that drives into the city five times a week.

Answer is E..... The conclusion is as follows: The use of LRT will decrease congestion, improve revenue, lower automobile emissions.

A and B weakens cause they will not add to the LRT revenues and wont stop using cars.
C weakens cause if LRT fares drop, we cannot realistically say that LRT revenues will increase
D says congestion still wont be solved.
E is irrelevant. It does not say specifically that revenues of LRT will be increased, nor any of the objectives solved.

I goofed up by first choosing C. since the answer was not mentioned read again and realised E made more sense. OA please?
Join the discussion

by Birottam Dutta » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:57 pm
Its a real tough one and C is really tempting but I would go with E!

The conclusion is three fold- environmental cleansing, lesser traffic congestion and increased revenues of the rail system

A negates environmental cleansing
B states that motorists will still drive into the city inspite of the increased toll so this also weakens the argument
C talks of subsidized rail fares which may not lead to increased revenues of the rail system
D talks of street renovations which will leads to traffic congestion.
E does nothing for the argument i.e., neither weakens nor strengthens it.

C is really really tempting.

But would go with E!
Join the discussion

by Sharma_Gaurav » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:30 am
straight arrived at option E in 2 minutes and 8 seconds.
option E is irrelevant and does not affect the argument in any way. Reasons are already explained by others above.
Join the discussion