BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan "rant"

Expert replies
by DanaJ » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:59 pm
Before I start cursing or anything, I want to make smth clear: Kaplan's by far my fave. Barron's was a waste of money, but I don't regret buying Kaplan Premier and Kaplan 800. It's great that they have an "instructions, tips and how-to's" section before jumping to the practice questions; this is, IMHO, the weakest point of the OG. They sort of compensate each other nicely: Kaplan has the explanations/tips, OG has the ton of official/real questions.

HOWEVER

If they got the books right, why the hell did they get the tests so screwed up?! I thought that maybe people were exaggerating when they said that Kaplan scores are not reliable indicators; well, I got a taste of that today. After registering, I decided to take one of their tests. Finished quant with 35 mins to spare and had THREE wrong answers out of 37, all "miles" apart. No way my real quant score is 46...

Sorry for the rant, I just felt really bad about this...Moderators, feel free to erase this message....
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by T_A_M » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:30 pm
Thanks DanaJ
Agree OG11 is good for practise questions but I believe it falls apart when it comes to explaining the topic. I have found Kaplan & more recently MGMAT bar the most useful. MGMAT guides and online questions banks are excellent. The MGMAT SC guide is partticularly useful.
Join the discussion

Re: Kaplan "rant"

by 4seasoncentre » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:16 pm
DanaJ wrote:Finished quant with 35 mins to spare and had THREE wrong answers out of 37, all "miles" apart. No way my real quant score is 46...
maybe it is? :)
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:23 am
Kaplan rant over after my first test w/ score 800 (q55, v55) o.O

Impressions so far: Kaplan CATs quant is slightly different from the rest of the CATs I've taken so far. It's not necessarily more difficult, it's more "academic", so to speak. It's just my type of maths, but I perfectly understand why someone out of school for more than 3 years would find this stuff utterly terrifying.

Oh, and the scoring algorithm seems to be messed up just for the free CAT. The rest of them are truly OK. I think this is not the fairest way to do business; some have already pointed out that Kaplan usually skews results in order to get more students to sign up for the teacher/tutor programs and I believe that this claim is justified.
Join the discussion