BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan Question

Expert replies
by diegoasaavedra » Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:37 am
Hi guys,

I have problem with this logic questions.

Kevin is paid more than Sharon. But since Cecili is paid more than Larry, it follows that Kevin's salary is higher than Larry's

Each of the following, if introduced into the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument above logically correct EXCEPT:

-Cecilia is paid more than Kevin.
-Sharon is paid more that Larry
-Sharon's salary is higher than Cecilia's
-Sharon and Cecilia are paid the same
-Kevin and Cecilia are paid the same

Answers is C, but I don't have a clue why.

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Logically Logical Answer

by rajorshic » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:37 am
The answer is wrong ..It should be A.

Logic follows: According to the question.
K>S , C>L
hence K>L.

I hope u can understand the alphabets.It is the first letter of each one's name.

Hence the options to make it logically correct are:

A.C>K
This is not proved since if C>L and C>K then K may or may not be greater than L
B.S>L
This is correct since: K>S and S>L .hence K>L
C.S>C
This is correct since: K>S and C>L ..hence S>C obviously means S>L and hence K>L (since K>S)
D.S=C
This is correct since K>S = K>C and C>L whiche means K>L
E.K=C
This is correct since C>L = K>L

The correct answer is hence A
Join the discussion

by diegoasaavedra » Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:13 pm
Thanks!
Join the discussion

by guynoor » Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:36 pm
Only the additional premise C resolves the argument -

c) K > S (GIVEN) ---------------- 1
S > C (ANS CHOICE C) -------------2
C > L (GIVEN) --------------- 4
-------------------------------
K > L (CONCLUSION WHICH IS ALSo GIVEN)

FROM 1 & 2 YOU CAN DEDUCE - K > C ---------- 3

NOW FROM 3 & 4 YOU CAN DEDUCE K > L WHICH IS THE CONCLUSION. NO OTHER ANSWER CHOICE WOULD LEAD YOU TO K > L AS CONCLUSION. HTH.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:28 am
It has to be A
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Thu May 03, 2012 4:16 pm
A must be the answer
Join the discussion

by confuse mind » Sun May 06, 2012 5:14 am
IMO - A
Join the discussion