Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Kaplan question - stuck!

Expert replies
by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:30 am
Hey guys hope you can help with the following question from Kaplan's Math book. I'm just starting out and would appreciate guidance! Thank you!

'solve the following inequality for x'

6>x+4>4

I can post the answer if people want to know!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sankruth » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:42 am
Is the answer 0 < x < 2?
Join the discussion

by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:50 am
yes! well done! would you mind explaining? Many thanks!
Join the discussion

Re: Kaplan question - stuck!

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:21 pm
vanesslondon wrote:'solve the following inequality for x'

6>x+4>4

With one big exception, we manipulate inequalities just like equations. It doesn't matter how many different pieces there are to the inequality.

Here, we want to solve for x.

Right now, we have x + 4... so, to get x by itself, we subtract 4 from all 3 parts of the inequality to get:

6 - 4 > x + 4 - 4 > 4 - 4

or

2 > x > 0

all done!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:25 pm
Thanks, Stuart, I so appreciate it! This was driving me mad!
I kept trying to get the answer by subtracting 4 from just one of the sides.
I am SO relieved - you know when a question won't let you go? Thank you!
Join the discussion

by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:31 pm
Sorry - one last thing:

do we still do the same thing to all parts of the equation, even if that entity isn't present in one part? By which I mean, if we have

2x>x>4

if we minus x, do we get

x>4-x

?

I just made up that question - completely hypothetical! Thank you!
Join the discussion

by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:34 pm
Sorry - one last thing:

do we still do the same thing to all parts of the equation, even if that entity isn't present in one part? By which I mean, if we have

2x>x>4

if we minus x, do we get

x>4-x

?

I just made up that question - completely hypothetical! Thank you!
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:25 pm
vanesslondon wrote:Sorry - one last thing:

do we still do the same thing to all parts of the equation, even if that entity isn't present in one part? By which I mean, if we have

2x>x>4

if we minus x, do we get

x>4-x
2x > x > 4

if we subtract x from all 3 parts we get

2x - x > x - x > 4 - x

or

x > 0 > 4 - x
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by vanesslondon » Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:40 pm
thank you, Stuart!
Join the discussion

by krusteekrab » Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:02 am
another way of looking at it.

6>x+4>4

this means that, if you substitute the value for x as 1 after looking at it more closely.

6 > 1+4 > 4 which is 6>5>4

also if you substitute 0<x<2 which is 0<1<2.
Join the discussion