BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan Question Doubt

Expert replies
by dhonu121 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:34 am
The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed mathematical tools used for disparate purposes including proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.

proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
completing the proof of the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
the proof of existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering

OA:C.
I have this doubt that is very basic but important.
This sentence is about very basic rules of parallelism. Here to get this correct, one just needs to make sure that the three items in the list are parallel.
My doubt emerges when I saw, in this sentence, two rather than three items that need to be parallel.
So,I saw the following items that need be parallel.
1.proving the existence of Nash equilibria
2.the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.


and the middle item, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping as modifying the 1 above.

How does one make sure that the items that need to be parallel are three rather than two items and one modifying the 1st one ?
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:52 am
Basically, what helps you decide in such a case is logical connection between the items and the meaning of the whole sentence. The listed items should all be not only grammatically but also logically parallel. Obviously it might be sometimes very challenging to decide whether they fit together.

What made you think that the middle item modifies the first?
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:04 am
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote: What made you think that the middle item modifies the first?
I just thought that the middle element is describing the Nash Equilibria

Also, in one of my previous posts in which you had replied, I had a follow up question.
Can pronoun refer to the noun in a prepositional phrase as its antecedent ?
For ex:
The popularity of cricket is well known, inspite of the fact that a few nations don't play it at all.

Can it refer to cricket here, given that cricket is in a prepositional phrase ?

If you can, please answer my previous post where you had replied.
Thanks.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:51 am
dhonu121 wrote:The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed mathematical tools used for disparate purposes including proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.

proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
completing the proof of the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
the proof of existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering

OA:C.
I have this doubt that is very basic but important.
This sentence is about very basic rules of parallelism. Here to get this correct, one just needs to make sure that the three items in the list are parallel.
My doubt emerges when I saw, in this sentence, two rather than three items that need to be parallel.
So,I saw the following items that need be parallel.
1.proving the existence of Nash equilibria
2.the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.


and the middle item, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping as modifying the 1 above.

How does one make sure that the items that need to be parallel are three rather than two items and one modifying the 1st one ?
@DHonu..please use spoilers!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1