BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan:Nomenclature

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:45 pm
Thanked: 2 times
by shubhamkumar » Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:18 pm
Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but sort

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

OA:B
Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
Last edited by shubhamkumar on Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pmFollowed by: 192 members
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:30 pm
I think the actual problem with A is that it uses "not only...but" when it should always be "not only...but also."
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 amFollowed by: 12 members
Thanked: 114 times

by patanjali.purpose » Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:16 pm
shubhamkumar wrote:Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
How can NEW TECHNOLOGY STILL employ the system - new technology means its recently developed..how can then we say it STILL EMPLOYING THE SYSTEM? Its illogical.

This to make sense we need someone/something that (or who, if something is HUMAN)has been using THE SYSTEM. B makes sense.

Furthermore, just to add to what Bill mentioned, NOT ONLY CLASSIFY....BUT TO sort (presence of TO is breaking the parallism)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:05 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dchhikara863 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:58 pm
Yea I agree.

Usually when you see a big clause and a comma after that you should think Modifier.

The first clause doesn't have a subject, so therefore what follows the comma is always the subject.

The question to be instantly asked without even reading the entire statement is who's employing the system. the answer would be biological taxonomists.

That's what follows the comma after the first clause. Modifiers once recognized can be quite easily tackled.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:36 pm
shubhamkumar wrote:Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but they also sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

OA:B
Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
well, the problem in A is " not onnly but to" because the correct form is " not only... but also.
Futhermore, technology is an object, its not a person, technology by itself cant employ a whole system....only B makes sense
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:45 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by shubhamkumar » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:55 am
Sorry Guys.Made a mistake in the original post(copied it from a different blog).I have corrected the question to what it appears as in the Kaplan test.:oops:
Even I was looking for "not only...but also" but this kaplan test question did not have also in choice B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 amFollowed by: 43 members
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:19 am
Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

NOT ONLY X BUT Y

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

NOT ONLY X, BUT ALSO Y

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but they also sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

IMO: B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:45 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by shubhamkumar » Sat Apr 07, 2012 4:17 am
@GMATKiss see the edited question, it no more has the but also part of the idiom in it.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 18 times

by tanviet » Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:42 am
gmat only accept "not only ... but also" not "not only but" , I will not study this question.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:12 pm
duongthang wrote:gmat only accept "not only ... but also" not "not only but" , I will not study this question.
this is a good idea... i think we should not study this kinda of question ... anyways are you vietnamese?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1