Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan:Nomenclature

Expert replies
by shubhamkumar » Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:18 pm
Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but sort

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

OA:B
Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
Last edited by shubhamkumar on Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:30 pm
I think the actual problem with A is that it uses "not only...but" when it should always be "not only...but also."
Join Veritas Prep’s 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:16 pm
shubhamkumar wrote:Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
How can NEW TECHNOLOGY STILL employ the system - new technology means its recently developed..how can then we say it STILL EMPLOYING THE SYSTEM? Its illogical.

This to make sense we need someone/something that (or who, if something is HUMAN)has been using THE SYSTEM. B makes sense.

Furthermore, just to add to what Bill mentioned, NOT ONLY CLASSIFY....BUT TO sort (presence of TO is breaking the parallism)
Join the discussion

by dchhikara863 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:58 pm
Yea I agree.

Usually when you see a big clause and a comma after that you should think Modifier.

The first clause doesn't have a subject, so therefore what follows the comma is always the subject.

The question to be instantly asked without even reading the entire statement is who's employing the system. the answer would be biological taxonomists.

That's what follows the comma after the first clause. Modifiers once recognized can be quite easily tackled.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:36 pm
shubhamkumar wrote:Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but they also sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

OA:B
Question is why can't new technology employ the system of binomial nomenclature as in A,but only taxomonists can in B?
well, the problem in A is " not onnly but to" because the correct form is " not only... but also.
Futhermore, technology is an object, its not a person, technology by itself cant employ a whole system....only B makes sense
Join the discussion

by shubhamkumar » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:55 am
Sorry Guys.Made a mistake in the original post(copied it from a different blog).I have corrected the question to what it appears as in the Kaplan test.:oops:
Even I was looking for "not only...but also" but this kaplan test question did not have also in choice B.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:19 am
Still employing the system of binomial nomenclature devised in the eighteenth century by Linnaeus, new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort their evolutionary relationships by an approach that analyzes the sequences of DNA

A- new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but to sort

NOT ONLY X BUT Y

B- modern day biological taxonomists using new technology can not only classify species, but also sort

NOT ONLY X, BUT ALSO Y

C- using new technology enables modern day biological taxonomists to not only classify species, but they also sort

D- using new technology not only in classifying species, but modern day biological taxonomists are enabled to also sort them for

E- When modern day biological taxonomists are enabled by new technology, not only do they classify species, they also can sort

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by shubhamkumar » Sat Apr 07, 2012 4:17 am
@GMATKiss see the edited question, it no more has the but also part of the idiom in it.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:42 am
gmat only accept "not only ... but also" not "not only but" , I will not study this question.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:12 pm
duongthang wrote:gmat only accept "not only ... but also" not "not only but" , I will not study this question.
this is a good idea... i think we should not study this kinda of question ... anyways are you vietnamese?
Join the discussion