BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

kaplan ds test 1 Q20. value of x(square) - 1. OA wrong ?

Expert replies
by raghavsarathy » Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:01 pm
Question - What is the value of x(square) - 1

1. Value of x(square) - 5x= -6
2. (x(square) - 1 )/(x-1) = 1

[spoiler]OA = B[/spoiler]

[spoiler]IMO = C[/spoiler]

Each of the 2 quadratic eqns would give us 2 values of x and hence we will find the comon value of x using both eqns and hence my ans was C

The problem with the Kaplan ans is that for eqn 2 , they cancel out (x-1) after expanding the numerator. Isn't this wrong ? because we are in essence losing out a value of x. [spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

raghavsarathy wrote:Question - What is the value of x(square) - 1

1. Value of x(square) - 5x= -6
2. (x(square) - 1 )/(x-1) = 1

[spoiler]OA = B[/spoiler]

[spoiler]IMO = C[/spoiler]

Each of the 2 quadratic eqns would give us 2 values of x and hence we will find the comon value of x using both eqns and hence my ans was C

The problem with the Kaplan ans is that for eqn 2 , they cancel out (x-1) after expanding the numerator. Isn't this wrong ? because we are in essence losing out a value of x. [spoiler][/spoiler]
No I dont think Kaplan is wrong in canceling out the numerator, b/c if you plug the value of x after cancelling out the numerator, it still gives you a value of 1.

x^2 - 1 is essentially the same thing as (x^2 - 1^2)/(x-1) = 1

[(x+1)(x-1)]/[x-1] = 1

x+1 = 1

x = 0.

you can plug back 0 in the original case 2 and see that, it is the only value of x that works out to be 1.

so (B)
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:11 pm
In part 2, canceling this out is okay, because the rule is: you can't ever divide or multiply by 0. Cancelling out the x - 1 is okay since we know that x can't ever be 1 in the second equation (see what happens if you try substitution). If we lose a value in the second equation, there's only one value left to try, so we are done. The answer is thus B.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:25 am
Thanks guys. i missed the point that for the second Eqn x=1 would result in an invalid eqn with denomnator 0.
Join the discussion

by rah_pandey » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:26 pm
As far as I remember from high school maths x<>1 should be specifically mentioned in order for cancellation to take place. we cannot assume that x<>1 because it would make the equation invalid. I think Stuart can explain more on this.
Join the discussion