BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan CR

Expert replies
by davy420 » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:28 pm
This year wiliamsboro high school introduced a peer tutoring program in which students who performed poorly in class were tutored by those who performed well in class. The average score of the students being tutored were higher before the tutoring than afterwards. Clearly peer tutoring programs do more harm than good.

Each of the following if true would weaken the argument above except

A. Students who were tutored in the program have exhibited greatly improved study habits and an increased desire to learn

B.The average score of students who were not in the tutoring program declined by an even greater amount over the tutoring program.

C.The majority of the students who were tutored in the peer tutoring program enjoyed the program and preffered the tutoring to their regular classes.

D.The course work for which students were responsible at the end of the tutoring period was significantly challenging than that at the beginning of the tutoring period.

E.Most of the students tutored in a peer tutoring program at Gainsville high school showed marked improvement in there test scores.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by stubbornp » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:36 pm
imo C
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:36 pm
imo:D


i feel D is neutral: neither weakening nor strengthening,,,
Join the discussion

by davy420 » Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:45 pm
Answer is C can somebody explain why C is the answer.
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:14 pm
hmm.,,
one reason for C being the answer could be that,,,

*majority of the students enjoy and prefer tutoring classes to regular classes,,,

Thus it's possible that tutoring classes might be more entertaining or mite b givin less weightage to academics and therefore students enjoy it and thus dont help them in any way,,,
this supports d conclusion,,



But i dont see how D is also weakening in any way,,
Join the discussion

by stubbornp » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:01 am
raunekk wrote:hmm.,,
one reason for C being the answer could be that,,,

*majority of the students enjoy and prefer tutoring classes to regular classes,,,

Thus it's possible that tutoring classes might be more entertaining or mite b givin less weightage to academics and therefore students enjoy it and thus dont help them in any way,,,
this supports d conclusion,,



But i dont see how D is also weakening in any way,,

In D,it doesnt mention whether the work in the starting is good or bad.So we must assume it is Normal.It simply says work in end is better than beginning.Simply,Weakens the conclusion...
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:16 am
Conclusion: Clearly peer tutoring programs do more harm than good.

Weakening arguments: Any argument which states that peer tutoring programs are useful/do good

A
B
E

imo C - enjoyed the program because it was less efficient and challenging than what regular classes are. (Thus, peer tutoring programs are causing harm)

D - Coursework was more challenging after tutoring and that is the reason why scores declined after tutoring. (is not related to the conclusion, however it does support the evidence which states - The average score of the students being tutored were higher before the tutoring than afterwards)
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:43 am
Davy420,
how does kaplan explain this question?
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:29 am
D.The course work for which students were responsible at the end of the tutoring period was significantly challenging than that at the beginning of the tutoring period.


IMO D also weakens

I think it means that complexity of course increased
so had thr been no tutoring
more students would have scored less
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:46 am
Can someone plz. explain why B cannot be the answer

"The average score of students who were not in the tutoring program declined by an even greater amount over the tutoring program. "

If overall scores declined then it gives us a reason why scores of students being tutored were lower . This doesnot mean that peer tutoring programs did more harm than good.
Join the discussion

by Arunlal » Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:29 pm
Odd one out.
I feel A could be a right choice.
A- This clearly weakens the statemnt that peer tutoring is doing harm.
B- Could infer that the perr tutoring has impacted the good lots as well. this doesnt weaken
C- the reason for enjoyment can be anything. Whats important is that it should contribute to their good scores
D- Out of scope or too much to consider
E- This i feel can be right answer because it weakens the generalistion of the conclusion made. I didnt choose this because ...Subject of matter is William school not Gainsville school

Please share the Official Answer.
thanks
-Arun
Join the discussion

by davy420 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:58 pm
OA is C

This is Kaplans explaination
C fails to weaken this conclusion because it skirts the issue of academic benefit. The author has concluded that peer tutoring causes academic harm the fact that the students enjoy peer tutoring session doesn't contradict this or suggest that studenst recieve any academic benefit from them.

What the hell is this saying can someone explain?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:35 am
the question is which of the following weakens except, so our answer should be the one which doesnt not weaken the conclusion or has no effect on the conclusion or may be strenghthen the conclusion
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Fri May 13, 2016 1:24 am
It seems to me that the right answer is C.
Join the discussion